Ibadah Peraturan Vs Ibadah Normatif

Saya telah dibesarkan di Gereja Methodist semasa kanak-kanak beralih kepada persekutuan Kristian intervarsiti di sekolah pada masa sekolah menengah dan seterusnya, dan pada asasnya saya sentiasa terdedah kepada ibadat normatif. Ibadah normatif termasuk unsur-unsur yang tidak dilarang secara jelas oleh kitab suci, selagi ia konsisten dengan prinsip alkitabiah dan menggalakkan pembangunan. Itu akan meliputi seluruh spektrum ibadat antara mazhab, malah gereja tinggi seperti gereja tinggi Anglikan dengan ibadat liturgi selagi ia berkaitan dan selaras dengan prinsip alkitabiah dan menggalakkan pembangunan, saya tidak akan mempunyai masalah malah saya akan mempunyai pertalian yang hebat dan untuk itu.

Apakah itu dan mengapa Ibadat Regulatif

Tetapi apakah ibadah yang mengatur? Saya tidak pernah mendengarnya sehinggalah saya memasuki seminari pada tahun terakhir saya. Saya mengikuti kelas jam kredit selama dua jam mengenai ibadah kawal selia oleh Dr Duncan dan saya hairan ada perkara sedemikian yang dipanggil ibadah kawal selia. Pada asasnya hujah untuk itu sebenarnya terdapat dalam:

Keluaran 20:1–5 (ESV) Dan Allah mengucapkan segala firman ini, berfirman, 2 “Akulah TUHAN, Allahmu, yang membawa kamu keluar dari tanah Mesir, dari rumah perhambaan. 3 “Janganlah kamu mempunyai tuhan lain di hadapan-Ku. 4 “Jangan membuat bagimu patung pahatan, atau apa pun yang menyerupai apa pun yang ada di langit di atas, atau yang ada di bumi di bawah, atau yang ada di dalam air di bawah bumi. 5 Jangan sujud menyembah kepadanya atau beribadah kepadanya, sebab Aku, TUHAN, Allahmu, adalah Allah yang cemburu, yang membalaskan kesalahan bapa kepada anak-anaknya, kepada generasi ketiga dan keempat dari orang-orang yang membenci Aku.

Dalam Keluaran 20, Tuhan menetapkan 10 perintah untuk Musa memberitahu semua orang Israel, dan sebelum itu Dia memberi mereka latar belakang mengapa Sepuluh perintah kepada bangsa Israel. Saya suka fakta bahawa Tuhan mula berkata, “Akulah Tuhan, Tuhanmu yang telah membawa kamu keluar dari Rumah perhambaan, jangan kamu mempunyai tuhan lain di hadapan-Ku.” Dia menetapkan kredibilitinya, Dia menetapkan siapa Dia sebelum memberitahu Israel apa yang perlu dilakukan. Saya percaya bahawa perkara yang menarik tentang agama Kristian ialah anda perlu mengetahui siapa Tuhan agama Kristian sebelum cuba melakukan moral dan perintah agama Kristian. Jika anda cuba melakukan atau mematuhi 10 perintah itu sendiri dengan berfikir bahawa itu akan menyenangkan Tuhan dan mendapat tiket untuk pergi ke syurga, tanpa mengenali Tuhan yang memberikan Sepuluh perintah, anda benar-benar salah dan dalam kesusahan. Inilah yang anda panggil legalisme, dan ia sebenarnya cukup berleluasa di dunia kita hari ini semata-mata kerana kejahilan tentang kebenaran firman Tuhan. Dan itulah sebabnya saya bersemangat untuk membawa semua ini dalam tulisan saya dan podcast saya dan dakwah dan pengajaran saya.

Sekarang dalam ayat berikutnya Tuhan berkata kamu tidak boleh membuat bagimu patung pahatan atau apa-apa rupa apa-apa yang ada di langit di atas atau di bumi di bawah atau air di bawah dan kamu tidak boleh sujud kepadanya atau beribadah kepadanya kerana Aku adalah Tuhan yang cemburu. Saya telah membacanya selama beberapa dekad yang lalu berfikir bahawa Tuhan memberi amaran kepada kita untuk tidak menjadikan apa-apa di dunia ini sebagai berhala untuk sujud dan bagi saya itu cukup jelas. Dan itu bersambung dengan ayat 3 yang mengatakan, “jangan ada tuhan lain di hadapan-Ku.” Dalam erti kata lain, jangan jadikan penyembahan berhala imej patung apa-apa yang ada di bumi atau di dalam air ini sebagai Tuhan. Dalam aplikasi zaman moden kita, ia hanya bermakna tidak mencintai apa-apa atau meletakkan harapan anda pada apa-apa yang melebihi siapa Tuhan seperti Augustine berkata masalah kita bukan cinta dunia, masalah kita adalah cinta yang tidak teratur. Sama seperti jika kita cintakan wang, cintakan keselesaan duniawi yang OK ke tahap yang besar, tetapi jangan jadikan ia sebagai alas yang sama dengan Tuhan kerana cinta apa pun di dunia ini yang setanding atau di atas Tuhan akan membawa kita ke dalam masalah melanggar perintah penyembahan berhala ini.

Walau bagaimanapun, dalam dunia yang telah diperbaharui, prinsip penyembahan yang mengatur sebenarnya berhujah bahawa:

3 “Janganlah kamu mempunyai tuhan lain di hadapan-Ku. 4 “Jangan membuat bagimu patung pahatan, atau apa pun yang menyerupai apa pun yang ada di langit di atas, atau yang ada di bumi di bawah, atau yang ada di dalam air di bawah bumi. 5 Jangan sujud menyembah kepadanya atau beribadah kepadanya, sebab Aku, TUHAN, Allahmu, adalah Allah yang cemburu, yang mengunjungi

Apabila Tuhan memerintahkan Israel untuk tidak membuat apa-apa gambaran apa-apa di bumi atau syurga atau air di bawah dan mereka tidak akan sujud kepada mereka dan berkhidmat kepada mereka, ajaran reformasi sebenarnya mengajar kita bahawa apa yang Tuhan katakan ialah jangan menyembah saya dalam bentuk patung yang berukir atau rupa apa pun di bumi, di syurga atau di dalam air. Sekarang ini sukar untuk ditelan kerana dalam ayat 5 Tuhan berkata kamu tidak akan sujud kepada mereka atau beribadah kepada mereka kerana Aku, Tuhan, Tuhanmu dan Tuhanku yang cemburu. Tuhan tidak mengatakan anda tidak akan sujud kepada mereka dengan menyangka bahawa saya sedang diekspresikan dalam patung-patung yang diukir itu. Tuhan jelas membezakan antara berhala-berhala itu dan dia, kerana Dia berkata jangan tunduk kepada mereka atau menyembah mereka.

Tetapi bagaimanapun, ini adalah bagaimana doktrin penyembahan yang mengawal selia datang melalui fakta bahawa Tuhan memerintahkan cara bagaimana Dia disembah dan tidak disembah melalui gambar-gambar itu. Contohnya, mungkin anak lembu emas yang Israel tunduk kepada anak lembu emas, adakah itu penyembahan berhala kepada anak lembu emas, atau adakah Israel berfikir bahawa Tuhan yang maha kuasa menampakkan diri dalam bentuk anak lembu emas? Dalam fikiran saya yang terakhir ini jelas satu kekejian.

Kecuali itu jika kita pergi dengan hujah mengenai ketetapan beribadat yang bermaksud:

• Prinsip Regulatif Ibadah: Ibadah mesti mengandungi hanya unsur-unsur yang diperintahkan atau dibenarkan secara jelas dalam Kitab Suci. Apa-apa yang tidak ditetapkan adalah dilarang.

• Prinsip Penyembahan Normatif: Penyembahan mungkin termasuk unsur-unsur yang tidak dilarang secara jelas oleh Kitab Suci, selagi ia konsisten dengan prinsip alkitabiah dan menggalakkan pembangunan.

Ibadah kawal selia termasuk hanya unsur-unsur yang diperintahkan atau dibenarkan secara jelas dalam kitab suci. Apa-apa yang tidak ditetapkan adalah dilarang. Itulah sebabnya ibadah peraturan dipanggil ibadah preskriptif. Walaupun penyembahan normatif mungkin termasuk unsur-unsur yang tidak dilarang secara eksplisit oleh kitab suci selagi ia konsisten dengan prinsip alkitabiah dan menggalakkan pembangunan.

John Calvin, Jonathan Edwards, dan Herman Bavinck semuanya condong ke arah penyembahan yang teratur. Walau bagaimanapun, untuk kejutan dan kegembiraan saya, saya mendapati Augustine lebih cenderung kepada penyembahan normatif.

Augustine & Ibadah Normatif—Pewatakan hati & pusat kitab suci

Dalam karya seperti On Christian Doctrine and City of God, Augustine menekankan bahawa penyembahan harus memuliakan Tuhan dan membina gereja. Dia memfokuskan pada watak hati dan pusat Kitab Suci, khotbah, dan sakramen (pembaptisan dan Ekaristi), tetapi dia tidak secara eksplisit mengehadkan penyembahan hanya kepada unsur-unsur yang diamanatkan oleh kitab suci.

Augustine menekankan bahawa penyembahan harus memuliakan Tuhan dan membina gereja, saya rasa dia betul-betul memahaminya. Sekarang apa yang dia tulis pada baris seterusnya adalah menarik kerana dia menulis dia memfokuskan pada watak hati dan pusat kitab suci, khutbah dan sakramen, dan itulah yang saya akan lalui. Saya fikir perkara yang paling penting ialah perkataan, “pewatakan hati dan pusat kitab suci.” Selagi ibadah itu mengandungi watak hati pengarang komposer dan dengan genre sentraliti kitab suci, saya fikir itu akan menjadi bentuk ibadat terbaik yang berlaku secara normatif. Jika anda melihat Augustine, seorang lelaki yang menulis salah satu buku penyayang yang paling menarik dan menarik dan sengit dalam dunia teologi Kristian, The Confessions, tidaklah sukar untuk melihat mengapa dia akan menumpukan perhatian kepada watak hati dan sentraliti kitab suci dalam ibadat. Malah saya berpendapat bahawa ibadah tanpa perwatakan hati sebenarnya akan menjadikan ibadah menjadi lebih tegar dan kering.

Saya rasa Tuhan tidak mahu mengambil watak hati itu daripada kita dalam penyembahan kita kepada-Nya dan itulah yang dimaksudkan dengan keseluruhan kitab mazmur. Daud menulis sebahagian besar penyembahan, pemujaan, doa, ratapan kitab mazmur dari lubuk hatinya dan itu adalah watak hati. Sebaiknya kita belajar daripada Daud dan menyatakan kecenderungan hati terhadap Tuhan dalam penyembahan kita, dalam penulisan lagu kita, dan penyembahan liturgi pada kebaktian gereja hari Minggu. Saya akan berpendapat bahawa Daud menulis mazmur dengan watak hatinya yang diilhamkan oleh Roh Kudus. Oleh itu, saya akan berhujah bahawa pada zaman moden Tuhan memberi kita ruang dalam ruang untuk kita menyatakan watak hati kita dalam lirik ibadat dan ibadat liturgi kita dengan intipati kitab suci. Selagi kita selaras dengan pemusatan kitab suci ia akan menjadikan ibadah lebih tulen dan ghairah.

Ibadah Normatif dalam liturgi gereja tinggi Anglikan dan Lagu Hill kontemporari dll.

Sebenarnya penyembahan normatif termasuk penyembahan gereja tinggi Anglikan gereja tinggi dengan banyak ungkapan liturgi dan kata-kata yang tidak secara langsung daripada kitab suci tetapi mengalir selaras dengan pusat kitab suci dan pembangunan gereja, saya pasti akan menyokongnya dan pergi dengan itu. Jadi ibadah normatif bukan sekadar lagu seperti Lagu Bukit, Lagu Ketinggian, lagu Bethel dan lain-lain. Saya sangat menyedari beberapa kesalahan teologi dalam beberapa gereja tersebut. Tetapi ada lagu-lagu yang bagus dari mereka dengan ekspresi hati yang spontan atau watak kepada Tuhan dengan kepusatan kitab suci walaupun agak berulang-ulang dan kurang format kata-katanya, namun, adalah penyembahan yang luar biasa sebenarnya saya fikir itulah yang menarik ramai orang muda ke gereja.

Reflections on Jesus in Quran

Given some of the things that Quran has written about Jesus, if the reverse were done in the other way round in the Bible regarding Muhammad, big row would have broken out. I find it astonishing the false heretical accusations thrown at Jesus the revered son of God in Christianity in all his glory as the Messiah of the world who died on the cross for humanity, been pushed around in Quran. Surah 5 verse 72 says Christians claim Allah the third of the three wrongly. Christians never claim God is the third of the three they have no understanding of the Bible and yet begin to point finger at the Bible. Trinity is 3 persons , one God.

Surah 4 verse 159 says Jesus will witness against Christians on the last day. I find this incredulous that they have the audacity to rewrite the holy book of Christianity that was already established some 600 years before Quran was written. So Muhammad claimed the revelation from Allah in the Quran that Jesus Christ will come back to this world on his return and witness against Christians on the last day? Really? When Christians are a part of the church which is the body of Christ himself! And Christ died for the church! Christ died for Christians! That’s total nonsense.

And I heard from the lecture that Quran Surah 4 and Surah 5 talked about Jesus a son of Mary told the people to worship Allah God alone.

And now they put on notice regarding Christians and Jews as Muslims’ enemies, Sura 5 verse 51 says Muslims should not take Jews and Christians as allies or friends. More astonishingly, in Surah 9 verse 29 says Muslims should fight Christians who do not believe in Allah and agree to submit! Can you imagine a so-called holy book calling for war against Christians because we Christians don’t believe in the Allah of Quran? Let’s turn it around do we ever say in our Bible or rather did the Lord ever said in our holy scripture the Bible that Christians should fight against Muslims who do not believe in Christ and agreed to submit? You see they don’t seem to understand submission comes in the form of Jesus the Lord of all washed the feet of his disciples and that is the master who washes the feet of his followers. Can you imagine the hearts of the followers how they are melted and submission it’s not even a question because it comes in so much love and adoration and that is Christianity!

From the intellectual point of view, for the Muslim scholars, my question is how do they analyze Quran that was written 600 years after the Bible, starts accusing the truth of the holy book of Christianity in a way to dispute the recorded teachings of Christ and the recorded Christ death and resurrection, they are not only disputing it but they are actually rewriting some of the major parts of the holy Bible and when they touched the son of God Jesus Christ in Quran in depicting him as mere man and a messenger prophet, how do Muslim scholars intellectually reconcile the validity of such assertions in Quran? The experiential part of the death and restoration can be taken care of quite easily, whether to believe and dispute, I get that as many sciences and modernity dispute that, but to reword and rewrite the teachings of Christ as to even label Christ to tell people to worship Allah (Islam god) alone, isn’t this almost feels like a fantasy talk of a recorded worldwide event that happened 600 years ago by Quran? Because this teaching has nothing to do with Quran per se, but it’s like taking an attack mode on another religion in middle East? You can disagree with Bible’s words on teaching of Jesus, but to change what Jesus actually teaches in the Bible is another thing!

Islam & Christianity’s Response to the decadent morality of the West

Al Ngu,   December 25, 2024

Peter Riddell has written on page 159 in his groundbreaking book “ Islam in context past, present, and future”, a hugely interesting perception and understanding of the interaction between western culture and Islam, and in some ways you can apply that to Christianity. What I’m trying to bring up is there is some similarities and contrast between Christianity and Islam in facing the Western culture.

Riddell expounded,  “the perception among Muslims on Western culture would be decadent and debased is fueled by regular statements in the Muslim media, both in the Middle East and among mostly minorities in the west, that reflected and often exaggerated moral decay in Western society.”[1]

The following quote from Invitation to Islam encapsulates the view: “Man in the West feels no obligation to protect women from the harms of society. This is why a man will allow his wife to be a stripper, a call girl, and even a prostitute. Honor knows no place in the West.”

A startling alarming cutting statement of the West. What we see is not representative of the Western society at all of course, but nonetheless, these films are spread all over the country, continent, and in reality the followers of these movie culture FAR exceeds the number of Christ followers, Christians today! The point is, it’s gigantic influence mental, cognitive, intellectual on the society is beyond the grip of society perception and understanding of Christian influence hands down. Imagine in Genesis 11-God told Abram to “Walk before me faithful, and be blameless”, and here we are in our generation or before, we totally butchered many of the commandments of God thru Moses, and ‘blameless’ is a vocab that’s hard to find.

Genesis 17 When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the Lord appeared to him and said, “I am God Almighty[a]; walk before me faithfully and be blamelessThen I will make my covenant between me and you and will greatly increase your numbers.”

Now there is some truth to it that it is true Western culture has become so liberal that especially in the Hollywood movies and media that actually promote promiscuity of women and movies essentially play on the lustful desire of men in our society. What’s worse media like Disney who has been famed to promote children’s wholesome activities, now promote LBGTQ agenda and themes on that line. Go figure? That is a degradation of moral values. Of course we are not talking about regulating movies so that none of those will come forth, but excessive sensual stuff needs to be curtailed to say the least. In fact, the wind of Hollywood depends on the mood, political power, and the Christian influence on the society as a whole. They are all interlinked. The last straw is the blasphemous show what they did in the Olympics opening ceremony 2024 in Paris, totally obliterated any sense of good faith and sense in France, with putting the abomination figures on the most holy sacred “The Last Supper” of Christ to be turned into some LBGT transgender table! It’s that dark and irreverent to God that’s akin to the abominatio figure that’s prophecies to stand in the most holy place in the Temple as prophesied by Jesus himself in the bible.  You can only believe when you see that. Try that on the Islamic faith teaching with Paris done to Christan faith, there will be uproar even a jihad! I heard that some decent actors like Mel Gibson and the like are putting together a new Hollywood broadcast to challenge the downright filth of the present.  What we are seeing is just not good to promote a healthy wholesome society. So in that sense, I will agree with what invitation Islam mentioned.

Riddell writes, “ no doubt Hollywood has a significant role in this process of stereotyping through his worldwide distribution of films, including sexually explicit material. However, this does not justify the broad extent of negative stereotyping on the west of the media around the world.” [2]

To ascend you at the point that the movie and films influence on the minds of the population, including the Christians has far reaching impact and effect. We will be naïve to think they’re going to this movies will be just fine because for the majority of this movies they are all lean towards very, very liberalthinking and philosophical war view.

The Bible says in Phil 4: Finally, brothers and sisters, whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable—if anything is excellent or praiseworthy—think about such things.

That’s it! Whatever is true, noble, lovely, admirable, excellent or praiseworthy think about such things. Do you see a lot of this in modern movies? That’s a problem because the Bible emphasizes think about things that praiseworthy not to think about the decadent morality lifestyle stories as we encounter in most of the movies. That is a huge impact upon a mind of emotion in self to go to such movies for example unfortunately, we are surrounded all over us and bombarded with such things, and if men are not cautious and careful will fall into the traps of this immorality unholiness. And that’s why it is important to stay far from this things for the focus on praise worthy and excellent things in the Lord. And you won’t be able to find them in Hollywood largely not available. So on the contrary, seeing those movies with such decadent movie moralities, we are doing a huge disservice to ourselves in our families and our church.

Everything is a balance, right? Yes I agree that the cultural backdrop of the west does not justify a total negative stereotyping on the West but mostly media around the world however there is definitely valid point, which in contrast Christianity has remained very silent and feeling helplessly in actuality in reality pretty much catapulted to the vast influence of Hollywood.

Riddell writes, “Western phobia refers to entrenched and endemically hostile attitude to the West, and to perceived cultural traits of the West.” He is right to say that this hostility to the West because of the downfall of moral values precisely.

Riddell  writes, “ The phenomenal phobia is encapsulated in common printed in common sense, the newsletter of Islamic party of Britain: “there’s nothing in western societies… The remotely resembles good behavior. They all walk in Haas, vanity and pump: insolent, arrogant and boastful.”

So I just thought about what Jesus said on exposing them.

Eph 5:8  For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light 9 (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) 10 and find out what pleases the Lord. 11 Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 It is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. 13 But everything exposed by the light becomes visible—and everything that is illuminated becomes a light.

Granted Paul was talking about having nothing to do with the deeds of darkness, but rather exposing the deeds of darkness amongst God’s people in the context of Ephesians 5. But if you look into it, it’s not going to be too big to extrapolate that to this world outside the church, although I wouldn’t do it in the exact same format, nevertheless, the principle of doing that remains unchanged. Jesus rebuked Pharisees of their hypocrisy with some strong blatant words:

Matt 23 27 “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean. 28 In the same way, on the outside you appear to people as righteous but on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and wickedness.

This is definitely something good serious reflection for all Christians today you find that the one is protesting about immoral deeds of a society mostly from the Catholic Church if there’s anything, for example the abortion issues on the public arena, bravo to them, as much as evangelical disagree their doctrines. But we Evangelical have remained pretty quiet sadly. But take it to a step further looking at what Islam has done even though the principle of such is definitely a doctrine issue. We are disagreeing with them on a whole host of things and how God is different from theirs, nevertheless, there’s something to be applauded in the conviction and bold speaking out in the public square, which is sadly much of a silence among the evangelicals, and reformed world.


[1] Peter Riddell, Islam in Context, (Baker academic, Grand rapids, Michigan:2003)  159

[2] Ibid

Religious faith’s view of moral values of the West

Al Ngu,   December 25, 2024

Peter Riddell has written on page 159 in his groundbreaking book “ Islam in context past, present, and future”, a hugely interesting perception and understanding of the interaction between western culture and Islam, and in some ways you can apply that to Christianity. What I’m trying to bring up is there is some similarities and contrast between Christianity and Islam in facing the Western culture.

Riddell expounded,  “the perception among Muslims or western culture would be decadent and debased is fueled by regular statements in the Muslim media, both in the Middle East and among mostly minorities in the west, that reflected and often exaggerated moral decay in Western society.”[1]

The following quote from invitation to Islam encapsulate the view: “Man in the West feels no obligation to protect women from the harms of society. This is why a man will allow his wife to be a stripper, a call girl, and even a prostitute. Honor knows no place in the West.”— startling alarming cutting statement of the West. What we see is not representative of the Western society at all of course, but nonetheless, these films are spread all over the country, continent, and in reality the followers of these movie vulture FAR exceed number of Christ followers, Christians. The point is, the gigantic influence mental, cognitive, intellectual on the society is beyond the grip of society perception and understanding an beats Christan influence hands down. Imagine in Genesis 11-God told Abrahm to “Walk before me faithful, and be blameless”, and here we are in our generation or before, we totally butchered many of the commandments of God thru Moses, and ‘blameless’ is a vocab that’s hard to find.

Genesis 17 When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the Lord appeared to him and said, “I am God Almighty[a]; walk before me faithfully and be blamelessThen I will make my covenant between me and you and will greatly increase your numbers.”

Now there is some truth to it. It is true Western culture has become so liberal that especially in the Hollywood movies and media that actually promote promiscuity of women and movies essentially play on the lustful desire of men in our society. What’s worse media like Disney who has been famed to promote children’s wholesome activities, now promote LBGTQ agenda and themes on that line. Go figure? That is a degradation of moral values. Of course we are not talking about regulating movies so that none of those will come forth, but excessive sensual stuff needs to be curtailed to say the least. In fact, the wind of Hollywood depends on the mood, political power, and the Christian influence on the society as a whole. They are all interlinked. The last straw is the blasphemous show what they did in the Olympics opening ceremony 2024 in Paris, totally obliterated any sense of good faith and sense in France, with putting the abomination figures on the most holy sacred “The Last Supper” of Christ to be turned into some LBGT transgender table! It’s that dark and irreverent to God that’s akin to the abominatio figure that’s prophecies to stand in the most holy place in the Temple as prophecies by Jesus himself in the bible.  You can only believe when you see that. Try that on the Islamic faith teaching with Paris done to Christan faith, there will be uproar even revolution! I heard that some decent actors like Mel Gibson and the like are putting together a new Hollywood broadcast to challenge the downright filth of the present.  What we are seeing is just not good to promote a healthy wholesome society. So in that sense, I will agree with what invitation Islam mentioned.

Riddell writes, “ no doubt Hollywood has a significant role in this process of stereotyping through his worldwide distribution of films, including sexually explicit material. However, this does not justify the broad extent of negative stereotyping on the west of the media around the world.” [2]

Everything is a balance, right? Yes I agree that the cultural backdrop of the west does not justify a total negative stereotyping on the West but mostly media around the world however there is definitely valid point, which in contrast Christianity has remained very silent and feeling helplessly in actuality in reality pretty much catapulted to the vast influence of Hollywood.

Riddell writes, “Western phobia refers to entrenched and endemically hostile attitude to the West, and to perceived cultural traits of the West.” He is right to say that this hostility to the West because of the downfall of moral values precisely.

Riddell  writes, “ The phenomenal phobia in capsule in common printed in common sense, the newsletter of Islamic party of Britain: “there’s nothing in western societies… The remotely resembles good behavior. They all walk in Haas, vanity and pump: insulin, arrogant and boastful.”

So I just thought about what Jesus said on exposing them.

Eph 5:8  For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as children of light 9 (for the fruit of the light consists in all goodness, righteousness and truth) 10 and find out what pleases the Lord. 11 Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them. 12 It is shameful even to mention what the disobedient do in secret. 13 But everything exposed by the light becomes visible—and everything that is illuminated becomes a light.

Granted Paul was talking about having nothing to do with the deeds of darkness, but rather exposing the deeds of darkness amongst God’s people in the context of Ephesians 5. But if you look into it, it’s not going to be too big to extrapolate that to this world outside the church, although I wouldn’t do it in the exact same format, nevertheless, the principle of doing that remains unchanged. Jesus rebuked Pharisees of their hypocrisy with some strong blatant words:

Matt 23 27 “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You are like whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean. 28 In the same way, on the outside you appear to people as righteous but on the inside you are full of hypocrisy and wickedness.

This is definitely something good serious reflection for all Christians today you find that the one is protesting about immoral deeds of a society mostly from the Catholic Church if there’s anything, for example the abortion issues on the public arena, bravo to them, as much as evangelical disagree their doctrines. But we Evangelical have remained pretty quiet sadly. But take it to a step further looking at what Islam has done even though the principle of such is definitely a doctrine issue. We are disagreeing with them on a whole host of things and how God is different from theirs, nevertheless, there’s something to be applauded in the conviction and bold speaking out in the public square, which is sadly much of a silence among the evangelicals, and reformed world.


[1] Peter Riddell, Islam in Context, (Baker academic, Grand rapids, Michigan:2003)  159

[2] Ibid