Changing the World Begins with a Transformed Heart

The fruit of the Spirit can’t be manufactured. Galatians 5 shows us where it grows.

I heard a preacher say something recently that has stayed with me. The United Nations, he said, spends billions of dollars year after year, and the world only grows more chaotic. His diagnosis was simple: there is no fruit of the Spirit. No love. No patience. No self-control. No transformed hearts.

He is right. I want to say that clearly before I say anything else.

Picture a world thick with patience. Neighbors who are gentle with one another. Leaders who are not self-seeking. Rivals who choose kindness over revenge. The fruit of the Spirit really is the answer to the depravity and chaos we live in.

But that answer leaves the real question hanging in the air. The multimillion-dollar question is not what we need. It is how we get there.

The Right Answer, the Missing Power

Here is the danger. If we simply tell people that love, joy, and peace are the goal, and then send them off to try harder, we have turned the fruit of the Spirit into a self-improvement project. Lean in. Do your best. Be a little kinder this week than last.

It will never work.

Paul does not call these things the fruit of effort. He calls them the fruit of the Spirit. They grow out of a life that God himself is working in. This is where Reformed theology shines, because it refuses to flatter us. It says plainly: you cannot do this. But Christ, by his Spirit, can do it in you.

Paul knew the end of his own strength. “Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!” (Romans 7:24–25). And a few lines later: “For the law of the Spirit of life has set you free in Christ Jesus from the law of sin and death” (Romans 8:2).

Set free. Not by trying. By being empowered.

So how exactly does the Holy Spirit do it? Galatians 5 tells us.

Walk by the Spirit

The famous list of the fruit sits in verse 22, but you have to read the whole chapter to understand it. The key is verse 16:

“But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh. For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other, to keep you from doing the things you want to do.” (Galatians 5:16–17)

The ESV Study Bible puts it in a sentence I keep coming back to: “The only way to conquer the flesh is to yield to the Spirit.” The notes go on to explain that “walk by the Spirit” carries two ideas at once: direction and empowerment. We make our decisions according to the Spirit’s guidance, and we act in the power the Spirit supplies. And in Scripture, to “walk” describes not a single step but the pattern of a whole life.

Direction and power. We need both.

First, conviction. We have to be persuaded that the desires of the flesh are actually wrong, and only the Holy Spirit can do that in a human heart. Second, strength. Once we know something is wrong, where do we find the power to say no when the temptation arrives? That power, too, comes from the Spirit.

This is what walking by the Spirit means. Our will is not bypassed. It is persuaded and transformed by the Spirit through the Scriptures, until it becomes available to God.

Why You Cannot Out-Muscle the Flesh

Notice what Paul does not say. He does not say, “Fight the flesh, and you will produce the Spirit.” He says, “Walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the flesh.”

That order matters. When we try to fight the desires of the flesh with the strength of the flesh, we have already joined the side we are fighting. Fallen human nature drifts toward its own desires automatically. Flesh cannot defeat flesh. Only the desires of the Spirit can stand against the desires of the flesh, because, as verse 17 says, these are opposed to each other.

This is why preaching that exposes the immorality of the world and calls people to bear good fruit, though it is correct, so often leaves them stranded. It hands them the truth without the grace. And grace is not only God’s kind disposition toward us. It is God’s own power in Christ Jesus, the grace that, as Paul tells Titus, trains us to renounce what is wrong and to live what is right (Titus 2:11–12).

Our Default Setting

Paul names the flesh with uncomfortable specificity:

“Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions, envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.” (Galatians 5:19–21)

“The desires of the flesh” are not just bodily cravings. They are the whole range of ordinary desires of our fallen nature, from sensuality to rivalry, from idolatry to envy. These are our default settings. Left alone, they keep showing up and popping out.

The only way to weaken them, starve them, and finally put them to death is to walk by the Spirit.

The Spirit Goes on the Attack

Then Paul turns:

“But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.” (Galatians 5:22–23)

The ESV Study Bible makes an observation here that I love. The Spirit does not fight sin only on defense. He also goes on offense, growing in Christians the very marks of godly character that we see in Jesus throughout the Gospels.

This is spiritual warfare. We are not merely bracing ourselves for the next assault from the enemy or from our own hearts. We are not meant to live in retreat. The Spirit advances, and he advances by making us more like Christ.

Look at what he produces. Love comes first, because it is the greatest, and because it most clearly reflects the character of God (1 Corinthians 13). Joy follows close behind: when we rejoice in God’s salvation, it shows our affections are resting in the right place (John 15:11). Peace is what grows when sinners are reconciled to God and are no longer his enemies, so that we can approach him with confidence and freedom (Romans 5:1–2; Hebrews 4:16). Patience means we have surrendered our own timetable, and our own ideas about how the world ought to run, to God’s plan. Kindness is goodness, generosity, and sympathy toward others, and it too mirrors God himself, whose kindness leads us to repentance (Romans 2:4). Goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control complete the portrait. Put them together and you get a face. It is the face of Jesus.

Do you want that fruit in your life? I hope so, because nothing matters more. The gifts of the Spirit and the fruit of the Spirit belong together, and I thank God for both. But you could cast out demons every day, lay hands on the sick every day, and lead people to Christ every day, and if this fruit is missing, Paul says you are a noisy gong. “If I have not love, I am nothing” (1 Corinthians 13:2).

Keeping in Step

Paul brings the chapter to a point in verse 25: “If we live by the Spirit, let us also keep in step with the Spirit.”

Life comes first. Then the walk. Jesus told Nicodemus, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit” (John 3:5–6).

Flesh can only ever give birth to flesh. The Spirit who gave us new birth is the same Spirit we now keep pace with, step by step, day by day. From beginning to end, it is supernatural.

Where the Fruit Begins

So we can never tell people to produce the fruit of the Spirit by gritting their teeth and pressing in harder. It is fruit. It grows from walking by the Spirit, letting him direct our lives and empower our choices.

What does that look like on an ordinary day? Let me give you a picture of how I try to walk by the Spirit.

For me, it begins early in the morning, before anything else. The phone stays face down. The inbox stays closed. Before the day can make its demands, I sit with the Lord who loved me and gave himself for me, and we talk. Not in a stiff, scripted way, but in honest, organic conversation, the way you talk with someone you love.

I do this because Jesus did it. “And rising very early in the morning, while it was still dark, he departed and went out to a desolate place, and there he prayed” (Mark 1:35). If the Son of God began his days in the Father’s presence before the crowds found him, how much more do I need to?

This is not legalism. It is following Christ. And I have been deeply empowered by it. Half an hour or more, first thing, sets the pace for the rest of the day.

In that time, I place the calling of God and the work in front of me into his hands. I acknowledge again Christ’s calling on my life. Often I pray something very simple: O Lord, set me apart for the work you have called me to do.

And I confess, every morning, that I cannot do any of it in my own strength. Paul gave me the words for that long ago: “I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me” (Galatians 2:20). When I pray that verse back to God, something shifts. I feel his power and his nearness.

I also pray through the Lord’s Prayer, slowly, making it my own. Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name. Your kingdom come, your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. I pray it over my wife and my kids, over my family, over the Bible study group in my office, over the people I love, over this city, and over our nation. His kingdom, his will, here, in these lives.

I have been stirred lately by what God is doing among young people in New York. Church of the City New York has seen thousands of Gen Z men and women come into its life, and they have set up hour-long lunchtime prayer gatherings every weekday, even inside places like Goldman Sachs and other major Manhattan firms. Prayer in the towers of finance. That is something.

It prompted me. This coming week, I am starting a thirty-minute prayer time with the Bible study group in my own office.

Set Apart

I say all this to make one point clear. Walking by the Spirit is not only asking God to make me more patient, more kind, more gentle, though those prayers matter deeply. It is also yielding to his call.

In Antioch, as the church was worshiping and fasting, “the Holy Spirit said, ‘Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them'” (Acts 13:2). To be set apart is to be dedicated. It is sanctification: a life handed over to God for his purposes. And a life set apart is exactly the soil where the fruit of the Spirit grows.

Notice, too, that the Spirit spoke. The church in Antioch heard the Holy Spirit’s direction in a gathering of worship, and that is the gifts of the Spirit at work. This is why I believe the fruit of the Spirit and the gifts of the Spirit, prophecy included, go hand in hand. The fruit shapes who we are. The gifts equip what we are sent to do. A Spirit-filled life needs both.

To Change the World

The preacher was right. The world will not be fixed by billions of dollars. To change the world, we must first be changed, from the inside out, until the fruit of the Spirit begins to show in our love, our patience, our self-control.

But the fruit of the Spirit on its own is not the whole story. The same Spirit who grows fruit in us also gives gifts to us, power for the mission he has set us apart to do. That is where I want to go next time.

For now, it starts somewhere small. A dark morning. A quiet room. A person on their knees, saying, Lord, I cannot do this. Set me apart. Christ, live in me.

Then they stand up and take the first step.

Scripture quotations are from the ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®), © 2001 by Crossway. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

The Christ Who Understands

Dear friends,

Thank you to everyone who joined today’s fourth session of our Christ-Centered—Knowing Christ • Living in Christ • Experiencing Christ series. I appreciated your presence, thoughtful sharing, and willingness to explore God’s Word together.

Today’s message, “The Christ Who Understands” (Hebrews 4:14–16), brought us three wonderful encouragements:

Hold firmly to our faith: Jesus, our great High Priest, has entered heaven and represents us before the Father.
Bring our weaknesses to Him: Jesus experienced suffering and temptation, yet remained without sin. He understands our struggles, and we can come to Him honestly.
Approach God’s throne of grace: We do not have to wait until we have everything together. Through Christ, we are invited to receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.
What an encouragement to know that the One who reigns in heaven also understands our struggles here on earth!

You can watch today’s teaching here:
The Christ Who Understands—Teaching Video⁠Attachment.png

Singing “Great Is Thy Faithfulness” together was another special part of our gathering. It blessed my heart, and I appreciated hearing how it encouraged others too. We hope to sing together again at our Tuesday prayer meeting and Thursday Bible exposition.

Next Thursday, October 8, we will continue with Session 5: “The Christ Who Humbled Himself for Us” (Philippians 2:5–8). We will explore why the eternal Son of God took the form of a servant and humbled Himself even to death on a cross. What does this reveal about His love for us—and how might knowing Him reshape the way we live and treat one another? I hope you will join us.

Our new Tuesday prayer meeting begins October 6 at 12:30 p.m. We will share a short passage from the Psalms and pray for one another’s needs. You are welcome to come, whether you would like to share a request or simply join us in prayer.

Thank you for helping us grow into a community that learns, sings, and prays together.

Warmly,
Al

Christ in All the Scriptures

Dear friends,

Thank you to everyone who joined yesterday’s Bible exposition. We had nine people participating—five remotely through Teams and four in the conference room. I am grateful for each of you and for the thoughtful attention, questions, and conversation.

In Session 3, “Christ in All the Scriptures,” we explored Luke 24:13–35 and the encounter between Jesus and the two disciples on the road to Emmaus. They knew the events surrounding Jesus’ death and had even heard the reports about the empty tomb, but they did not yet understand what God was doing. Then Jesus came alongside them and, beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, showed them how the Scriptures ultimately pointed to him.

The Bible is more than a collection of moral teachings or principles telling us to work harder in our own strength. It is the unfolding revelation of God’s redemptive story centered in Jesus Christ—who he is, why he had to suffer, and how his death and resurrection accomplished the salvation we could never accomplish for ourselves. The cross was not an interruption of God’s plan; it was the fulfillment of God’s plan. My prayer is that we will not merely know more information about the Bible, but that we will encounter the living Christ through the Scriptures and experience our hearts coming alive to him.

If you missed the session or would like to hear it again, you can watch it here:

Watch “Christ in All the Scriptures” on YouTube⁠

Next Thursday, we will continue our CHRIST-CENTERED: Knowing Christ • Living in Christ • Experiencing Christ series with Session 4:

The Christ Who Understands — Hebrews 4:14–16

Many people believe that God is distant from their struggles or disappointed by their weaknesses. But Hebrews presents Jesus as our great High Priest who has entered heaven for us and who understands human weakness from the inside. He was tempted as we are, yet without sin. Because of Christ, we do not have to hide from God, pretend to be stronger than we are, or carry our burdens alone.

Hebrews gives us this remarkable invitation: “Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.” Christ does not merely know about our suffering from a distance. He entered our humanity, experienced temptation and suffering, and now welcomes us to come honestly and confidently before God.

How would your relationship with God change if you truly believed that Christ understands what you are facing? What if your weakness were not a reason to run away from God, but the very reason to draw nearer to his throne of grace?

I hope you will join us next Thursday as we consider the Christ who understands us, represents us before the Father, and gives mercy and grace precisely when we need them most. I will be praying for each of you throughout the week.

Grace and peace,
Al

911 Memorial-

Al Ngu.  September 11, 2026

Good morning.

This morning, we gather in a solemn moment to remember September 11 and all that this day represents for our city, our nation, and for so many families whose lives were forever changed. We remember with gratitude those who gave their lives, including Dick Morgan and the many men and women who served in the aftermath of that terrible day. We honor their courage and sacrifice, and we give thanks for those who continued to serve, even when the immediate crisis had passed and the consequences continued for years afterward.

But this morning, I want us not only to remember what happened, but to consider where we can find hope in the face of suffering and loss. Because when we stand in a place of remembrance like this, one question inevitably comes to us: Where do we turn when life is broken? Where do we find strength when we experience things that we cannot explain? And where can we find hope when the wounds of the past continue to affect the present?

The Bible does not give us a shallow answer to those questions. Scripture does not tell us to ignore suffering or simply move beyond it. In fact, one of the most remarkable things about the Bible is that it gives us permission to grieve. The book of Lamentations was written in the midst of tremendous devastation. Jeremiah looked honestly at suffering, loss, and destruction. Yet, right in the middle of his grief, he says, “But this I call to mind, and therefore I have hope: The steadfast love of the LORD never ceases; his mercies never come to an end; they are new every morning; great is your faithfulness.”

“This I call to mind, and therefore I have hope.” What a beautiful word for a morning like this. We remember, but our remembrance does not have to end in despair. We can acknowledge the darkness without believing that darkness has the final word. We can grieve what has been lost while still believing that God is faithful. His mercies are new every morning. His faithfulness has not ended.

And Psalm 46 gives us another beautiful promise: “God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.” It doesn’t say that God’s people will never experience trouble. It says that when trouble comes, God is present. He is our refuge and our strength. And the Psalm goes on to say, “God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved.”

That is a message that New York City needs to hear—not only on September 11, but every day. We have experienced tremendous suffering, but we have also witnessed extraordinary courage, compassion, and service. We have seen people run toward danger to save others. We have seen people serve their neighbors, care for strangers, and continue to carry burdens that many of us will never fully understand. We give thanks for that legacy of service, and we pray that it will continue in the generations ahead.

But ultimately, our hope is not in our own strength. Our hope is in God.

And for those of us who believe in Jesus Christ, that hope becomes even more personal.

Because Christianity does not tell us that God watches suffering from a distance. The Christian faith tells us that God came into our suffering.

Jesus Himself wept.

When Jesus stood before the tomb of His friend Lazarus, He knew that He was about to raise Lazarus from the dead. He knew what He was going to do. And yet, when He saw Mary weeping and those around her grieving, the Bible simply says, “Jesus wept.”

That tells us something profound about the heart of God. Jesus does not stand far away from human grief. He enters into it. He knows what it means to lose someone. He knows what it means to weep. He knows what it means to experience suffering.

And Jesus did not merely witness suffering. He Himself experienced betrayal, violence, rejection, and death. He went to the cross. He entered into the deepest darkness that human beings can experience.

But death was not the final word.

Jesus Christ rose again.

And that is the heart of Christian hope. Our hope is not simply that things will eventually get better. Our hope is that Jesus Christ has conquered sin and death, and because He lives, death does not have the final word.

That is why the Christian can grieve and still have hope. We don’t have to choose between remembering and hoping. We can remember those we have lost, we can acknowledge the pain that remains, and at the same time we can look toward a future that is held by God.

And the Bible gives us a beautiful picture of that future at the very end of Revelation. It says that God “will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore.”

Think about that promise: God Himself will wipe away every tear.

The tears that have been shed in New York. The tears of families who lost loved ones. The tears of those who served and carried the consequences afterward. The tears that perhaps are still shed privately, years later. God sees them. God knows them. And Scripture tells us that there is coming a day when He will wipe away every tear, when death will be no more, when mourning and pain will finally come to an end.

That is our hope.

So this morning, we remember with gratitude. We honor with respect. We grieve with those who grieve. And we look forward with hope—not because we have forgotten the darkness, but because we believe the darkness will not have the final word.

There is a future for New York City. There is a future for our families and for the generations that will come after us. And ultimately, there is a future in the hands of a faithful God who has not forsaken us.

So as we leave this place today, may we carry with us not only the memory of those we honor, but also the hope that comes from knowing that God is our refuge and strength, that His mercies are new every morning, and that in Jesus Christ, death is not the end.

Jesus wept. Jesus suffered. Jesus died. But Jesus rose again.

And because He lives, there is hope.

May God comfort those who still grieve, strengthen those who continue to serve, bless the city of New York, and lead us into the future with courage, compassion, and hope.

Thank you.

New York 911 Memorial

Good morning.

This morning, we gather in a solemn moment to remember September 11 and all that this day represents for our city, our nation, and for so many families whose lives were forever changed. We remember with gratitude those who gave their lives, including Dick Morgan and the many men and women who served in the aftermath of that terrible day. We honor their courage and sacrifice, and we give thanks for those who continued to serve, even when the immediate crisis had passed and the consequences continued for years afterward.

But this morning, I want us not only to remember what happened, but to consider where we can find hope in the face of suffering and loss. Because when we stand in a place of remembrance like this, one question inevitably comes to us: Where do we turn when life is broken? Where do we find strength when we experience things that we cannot explain? And where can we find hope when the wounds of the past continue to affect the present?

The Bible does not give us a shallow answer to those questions. Scripture does not tell us to ignore suffering or simply move beyond it. In fact, one of the most remarkable things about the Bible is that it gives us permission to grieve. The book of Lamentations was written in the midst of tremendous devastation. Jeremiah looked honestly at suffering, loss, and destruction. Yet, right in the middle of his grief, he says, “But this I call to mind, and therefore I have hope: The steadfast love of the LORD never ceases; his mercies never come to an end; they are new every morning; great is your faithfulness.”

“This I call to mind, and therefore I have hope.” What a beautiful word for a morning like this. We remember, but our remembrance does not have to end in despair. We can acknowledge the darkness without believing that darkness has the final word. We can grieve what has been lost while still believing that God is faithful. His mercies are new every morning. His faithfulness has not ended.

And Psalm 46 gives us another beautiful promise: “God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.” It doesn’t say that God’s people will never experience trouble. It says that when trouble comes, God is present. He is our refuge and our strength. And the Psalm goes on to say, “God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved.”

That is a message that New York City needs to hear—not only on September 11, but every day. We have experienced tremendous suffering, but we have also witnessed extraordinary courage, compassion, and service. We have seen people run toward danger to save others. We have seen people serve their neighbors, care for strangers, and continue to carry burdens that many of us will never fully understand. We give thanks for that legacy of service, and we pray that it will continue in the generations ahead.

But ultimately, our hope is not in our own strength. Our hope is in God.

And for those of us who believe in Jesus Christ, that hope becomes even more personal.

Because Christianity does not tell us that God watches suffering from a distance. The Christian faith tells us that God came into our suffering.

Jesus Himself wept.

When Jesus stood before the tomb of His friend Lazarus, He knew that He was about to raise Lazarus from the dead. He knew what He was going to do. And yet, when He saw Mary weeping and those around her grieving, the Bible simply says, “Jesus wept.”

That tells us something profound about the heart of God. Jesus does not stand far away from human grief. He enters into it. He knows what it means to lose someone. He knows what it means to weep. He knows what it means to experience suffering.

And Jesus did not merely witness suffering. He Himself experienced betrayal, violence, rejection, and death. He went to the cross. He entered into the deepest darkness that human beings can experience.

But death was not the final word.

Jesus Christ rose again.

And that is the heart of Christian hope. Our hope is not simply that things will eventually get better. Our hope is that Jesus Christ has conquered sin and death, and because He lives, death does not have the final word.

That is why the Christian can grieve and still have hope. We don’t have to choose between remembering and hoping. We can remember those we have lost, we can acknowledge the pain that remains, and at the same time we can look toward a future that is held by God.

And the Bible gives us a beautiful picture of that future at the very end of Revelation. It says that God “will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore.”

Think about that promise: God Himself will wipe away every tear.

The tears that have been shed in New York. The tears of families who lost loved ones. The tears of those who served and carried the consequences afterward. The tears that perhaps are still shed privately, years later. God sees them. God knows them. And Scripture tells us that there is coming a day when He will wipe away every tear, when death will be no more, when mourning and pain will finally come to an end.

That is our hope.

So this morning, we remember with gratitude. We honor with respect. We grieve with those who grieve. And we look forward with hope—not because we have forgotten the darkness, but because we believe the darkness will not have the final word.

There is a future for New York City. There is a future for our families and for the generations that will come after us. And ultimately, there is a future in the hands of a faithful God who has not forsaken us.

So as we leave this place today, may we carry with us not only the memory of those we honor, but also the hope that comes from knowing that God is our refuge and strength, that His mercies are new every morning, and that in Jesus Christ, death is not the end.

Jesus wept. Jesus suffered. Jesus died. But Jesus rose again.

And because He lives, there is hope.

May God comfort those who still grieve, strengthen those who continue to serve, bless the city of New York, and lead us into the future with courage, compassion, and hope.

Thank you.

Ruth Chose Yahweh: The Sovereign Grace Behind Her Costly Faith

Ruth 1:16–17 (ESV)
“Do not urge me to leave you or to return from following you. For where you go I will go, and where you lodge I will lodge. Your people shall be my people, and your God my God. Where you die I will die, and there will I be buried. May the LORD do so to me and more also if anything but death parts me from you.”

Why did Ruth choose to follow Naomi after her husband died?

At first glance, Ruth 1 appears to be a story about extraordinary human loyalty. A young widow refuses to abandon her mother-in-law and chooses to accompany her into a foreign land.

But if we look more deeply, we see something far greater.

Ruth’s decision was not merely an act of loyalty to Naomi. It was an act of faith in Yahweh.

And behind Ruth’s faith stands the sovereign grace of God.

The question, then, is not merely, “Why did Ruth choose Naomi?”

The deeper question is:

How did Ruth’s heart come to the point where she was willing to abandon her homeland, her people, her security, and her future—and entrust herself to the God of Israel?

The answer ultimately cannot be found in Ruth’s natural circumstances.

It must be found in the grace of God.

Ruth Had Already Encountered Yahweh

Ruth did not wake up one morning and suddenly decide, “I am going to become an Israelite.”

Something had already been happening in her heart.

Ruth had married an Israelite man and had lived within an Israelite household. She had lived with Naomi. She had encountered the people of Israel and, through them, the God of Israel.

She had heard the stories of Yahweh.

She had seen something of Israel’s worship.

She had lived within the community of God’s covenant people.

And most importantly, she had encountered Yahweh through Naomi and her family.

We should be careful not to speculate beyond Scripture. The Bible does not give us a detailed account of the precise moment Ruth came to faith.

But it gives us the evidence of what happened.

When the moment of decision came, Ruth trusted Yahweh.

She says:

“Your people shall be my people, and your God my God.”

She is not choosing an unknown deity.

She is entrusting herself to the God she had come to know.

And this is where the Reformed understanding of salvation helps us see the story more deeply.

Faith does not originate in autonomous human nature.

The natural human heart does not spontaneously move toward God.

If Ruth came to trust Yahweh, then ultimately we must say that God had been at work in Ruth before Ruth publicly declared her allegiance to God.

Her decision was real.

Her faith was real.

Her commitment was real.

But beneath her response was the prior grace of God.

As Paul says:

“For it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure.”
—Philippians 2:13

God was not merely waiting passively for Ruth to make the right decision.

He was working in her heart.

The Crisis Revealed What Grace Had Already Produced

This is where the death of Ruth’s husband becomes so significant.

Death exposed Ruth’s faith.

Before her husband’s death, Ruth could live within Naomi’s household and experience something of Israel’s faith while still having a relatively secure place in that family.

But now everything had changed.

Her husband was dead.

Naomi was returning to Bethlehem.

Ruth was a young widow.

There was no obvious economic advantage to following Naomi.

There was no guarantee of another husband.

There was no guarantee of children.

There was no guarantee of acceptance in Israel.

There was no guarantee that her life would become easier.

In fact, Naomi tells Ruth that she herself has experienced the bitter hand of God.

“The hand of the LORD has gone out against me.”
—Ruth 1:13

And yet Ruth says:

“Where you go I will go.”

Why?

Because something more fundamental than her circumstances had changed.

Her allegiance had changed.

This is one of the marks of genuine conversion.

Grace does not merely give us new information.

Grace gives us a new heart.

Ruth did not merely learn something new about Yahweh.

She came to desire Yahweh.

And when the cost of following Him became visible, her heart moved toward Him rather than away from Him.

That is why Ruth’s decision is so powerful.

Her circumstances did not create her faith.

Her circumstances revealed her faith.

Ruth Chose God When God Offered Her No Visible Advantage

This is perhaps the most striking feature of Ruth’s faith.

What exactly was Ruth gaining by going to Bethlehem?

Humanly speaking, almost nothing.

She was leaving:

  • her homeland,
  • her extended family,
  • her familiar culture,
  • her social network,
  • her religious environment,
  • her economic security,
  • and her possible future.

And what was she receiving?

Nothing that Naomi could guarantee.

Naomi could not promise her a husband.

She could not promise her children.

She could not promise her financial security.

She could not promise her happiness.

She could not even promise that Bethlehem would welcome her.

Ruth was essentially saying:

“Even if I have no earthly guarantee of blessing, I will still follow Yahweh.”

That is faith.

And that is also why Ruth’s faith points beyond Ruth herself.

True faith does not ultimately rest upon what God can give us.

True faith rests upon God Himself.

There is a Christianity that says:

“Follow God because He will make your life better.”

But Ruth’s story says something much deeper:

“Follow God because He is God.”

Even when the circumstances are bitter.

Even when the future is unknown.

Even when obedience is costly.

Even when there is no visible reward.

That is covenant faithfulness.

“Your God My God”: A Transfer of Allegiance

Notice the order of Ruth’s declaration:

“Your people shall be my people, and your God my God.”

This is much more than changing religious affiliation.

This is a transfer of allegiance.

Ruth is saying:

Your God is now my God.
Your people are now my people.
Your future is now my future.

She is leaving Moab and identifying herself with Israel.

She is leaving the gods of Moab and confessing Yahweh.

She is leaving her old identity and embracing a new identity among God’s covenant people.

This is remarkably close to the biblical pattern of conversion.

When God saves a person, He does not simply add another belief to that person’s existing identity.

He gives that person a new identity.

The New Testament calls this regeneration—being born again.

Jesus tells Nicodemus:

“Unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.”
—John 3:3

The order matters.

We do not first regenerate ourselves and then come to Christ.

God gives life, and the person who has been given life responds in faith.

God changes the heart, and the changed heart embraces Christ.

God calls, and His people come.

That is why Reformed theology speaks of effectual calling.

God’s call is not merely an external invitation that leaves the sinner unchanged.

God’s saving call penetrates the heart.

He opens blind eyes.

He gives a heart of flesh.

He brings the sinner from death to life.

And then the sinner comes willingly.

Ruth’s story gives us a beautiful Old Testament picture of this reality.

We do not see the mechanics of regeneration explained in Ruth 1.

But we see its fruit:

Ruth willingly embraces Yahweh.

Ruth’s Faith Took Her Toward God’s People

There is another important detail.

Ruth does not say merely:

“Your God will be my God.”

She first says:

“Your people shall be my people.”

Her relationship with God changes her relationship to God’s people.

That is significant.

Biblical conversion is not merely an individual spiritual experience.

God saves us into a people.

Ruth moves:

from Moab to Israel,
from her old people to God’s people,
from her old identity to a new identity,
from her old allegiance to Yahweh.

And ultimately this points forward to the church.

When Christ saves us, He does not merely save isolated individuals.

He makes us members of His body.

We become part of the household of God.

The gospel creates a new people.

And therefore Ruth’s confession has a profound ecclesial dimension:

“Your people shall be my people.”

I will belong to the people who belong to Yahweh.

Ruth Did Not Know the Plan—But God Did

Now we come to the most beautiful part of the story.

Ruth had no idea what God was doing.

She was simply following Naomi.

She did not know she would meet Boaz.

She did not know she would marry him.

She did not know she would have a son.

She did not know her son Obed would become the father of Jesse.

She did not know Jesse would become the father of David.

And she certainly did not know that she would eventually appear in the genealogy of Jesus Christ.

Matthew tells us:

“Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth, and Obed the father of Jesse.”
—Matthew 1:5

And from David’s line would come the Messiah.

Think about the providence of God.

Ruth thought she was simply choosing Naomi.

But God was bringing Ruth into the redemptive history of His Son.

Ruth saw one step.

God saw the entire road.

Ruth saw Bethlehem.

God saw David.

Ruth saw a future she could not understand.

God saw Christ.

That is providence.

God is not merely reacting to our decisions.

He is sovereignly directing history according to His eternal purpose.

And yet Ruth’s decision remains completely meaningful and completely voluntary.

She truly chose.

She truly believed.

She truly loved Naomi.

She truly followed Yahweh.

And behind and beneath Ruth’s genuine decision was the sovereign providence and grace of God.

This is the beautiful mystery of biblical theology:

God is sovereign, and therefore our faith is not meaningless.

God’s sovereignty does not eliminate human responsibility.

It establishes it.

Ruth Did Not Know the Future. She Knew Her God.

This brings us back to the theme of knowing God versus knowing about God.

Ruth did not know very much about what God was going to do.

She did not know God’s plan.

She did not know the future.

She did not know Boaz.

She did not know David.

She did not know Jesus.

She did not know that her name would be remembered for thousands of years.

But she knew enough of Yahweh to entrust herself to Him.

And that is the difference between knowing about God and knowing God.

Knowing about God says:

“I know the stories.”

Knowing God says:

“I will trust Him with my life.”

Ruth could not explain the whole theology of God’s covenant.

But she could say:

“Your God my God.”

She could not see God’s providence.

But she could walk into it.

She could not see the future.

But she could trust the One who held it.

That is faith.

And Here Is the Gospel in Ruth

There is an even deeper reason why Ruth’s story matters to Christians.

Ruth is not merely an inspiring story about a courageous woman.

She is part of the story of redemption.

A Moabite woman—an outsider to Israel—was brought into God’s covenant people and eventually became part of the genealogy of the Messiah.

That is already pointing us toward the gospel.

Because the gospel is the story of outsiders being brought in.

Gentiles being welcomed.

Sinners being reconciled.

Strangers becoming family.

Those who were once far away being brought near through Christ.

Paul says in Ephesians:

“But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ.”
—Ephesians 2:13

Ruth was a foreigner.

Ruth was a widow.

Ruth had no earthly claim to the privileges that would eventually come to her.

And yet, by God’s grace, she was brought in.

And remarkably, the woman who once stood outside Israel would become an ancestor of the King who would ultimately bring salvation not only to Israel but to the nations.

Ruth’s story is therefore not ultimately about Ruth.

It is about the God who saves.

It is about the God who calls.

It is about the God who regenerates hearts.

It is about the God who providentially directs ordinary decisions toward His extraordinary purposes.

And ultimately, it is about the God who was preparing the way for Jesus Christ.

The Sovereign God Who Leads Us One Step at a Time

Perhaps this is why Ruth 1:16–17 speaks so powerfully to us.

Ruth does not say:

“I know what will happen.”

She says:

“Where you go I will go.”

She does not say:

“I know where this will lead.”

She says:

“Your God my God.”

She does not say:

“I have guarantees about my future.”

She says:

“Where you die I will die.”

In other words:

“I don’t know what lies ahead.
I don’t know what Bethlehem will give me.
I don’t know whether my circumstances will improve.
I don’t know what God’s plan is.
But I know whom I am following.”

And that is faith.

Ruth did not know the future.
But she knew the God who held the future.

And perhaps that is exactly where God wants many of us to stand.

We want the whole plan.

God often gives us the next step.

We want the destination.

God gives us Himself.

We want guarantees.

God gives us His presence.

We want to know what He is doing.

God calls us to trust Him.

Because the deepest foundation of the Christian life is not knowing everything about God.

It is knowing God.

And when we truly know Him, His grace changes what we love, where we belong, whom we follow, and what we are willing to surrender.

Ruth surrendered her homeland.

She surrendered her people.

She surrendered her security.

She surrendered her future.

But she gained something infinitely greater:

Yahweh became her God.

And she could not yet see it, but Yahweh was bringing her into a story that would eventually lead to Bethlehem, David, and ultimately to Jesus Christ, the Redeemer of His people.

Ruth thought she was walking into an uncertain future.

In reality, she was walking into the sovereign providence of God.

And that is the confidence of every believer:

We may not know where God is taking us.
But we know who is taking us there.

Is My Cause Is Hidden from the Lord?

On Isaiah 40, and the God who does not grow tired of us

Signature: 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

You know the silence I mean.

You have prayed the same prayer so many nights that the words have worn smooth, like a coin handled too long. You have asked, and asked, and the ceiling has not moved. Months of it. Maybe years. And somewhere underneath the prayer a quieter sentence starts to form, one you would never say out loud in church: He isn’t listening. My case has been set aside.

That is where Isaiah 40 begins. Not in triumph. In exile.

Israel is far from home. Babylon has taken the temple treasures, taken the sons, taken the future. Isaiah had seen it coming a chapter earlier and said it plainly — the days are coming when everything in your house will be carried off, and nothing will be left. It happened. And now the people sit in a foreign city, under foreign gods, and the God who had called them mine has, as far as they can feel, gone quiet.

I want to stay on Babylon for a second, because Babylon was never only a place.

In Scripture, Babylon becomes shorthand for everything in the world that is impressive to the eye and set against God underneath. Gleaming on the outside. Rotten at the root. And here is the part that makes my heart go small: you can be carried into Babylon without ever noticing the journey. You can take on its values, its doctrines, its whole way of wanting things, and call it home. I look at the world I live in — I look at this country I love — and I see how much of it is exactly that. Confident. Beautiful. Quietly opposed to God. And most of the people inside it have no idea they’ve been taken.

So this is who the word of comfort comes to. Not the strong. The captured. The tired.

Comfort, comfort my people, says your God. Speak tenderly to Jerusalem.

Notice that He still says my people. After the exile. After the failure. Still mine.

And then Isaiah does something strange. To a people who feel forgotten, he preaches the sheer size of God. Who measured the oceans in the cup of his hand? Who has ever taught the Lord anything, shown Him a better way? The nations are one drop hanging off a bucket. Dust on a scale. He sits above the circle of the earth, and from up there we look like grasshoppers — all of us, the whole restless swarm of us. He brings out the stars one by one and calls each of the billions by name, and not one of them goes missing.

You would think that would only make a small, tired person feel smaller.

But watch where Isaiah is going. Right after the stars — right after establishing that God forgets nothing, not one distant burning thing in all that dark — he turns and looks straight at the exhausted heart and says back to it exactly what it has been whispering:

Why do you say, O Jacob, and speak, O Israel, “My way is hidden from the Lord, and my right is disregarded by my God”?

There it is. The real thing. Not does God exist — the exiles believed He existed. The wound is quieter than that, and closer to the bone. My case, mine specifically, has been overlooked. He is real, and He is powerful, and He is not paying attention to me.

And I love that God does not scold the doubt. He answers it.

Have you not known? Have you not heard? The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He does not faint or grow weary.

Read that slowly if you are tired tonight. He does not grow weary. The One who has been waiting with you does not get drowsy on the late shift. He does not lose the thread of your prayer somewhere around month eight. And his understanding is unsearchable — which means that if the answer is taking longer than you can bear, it is not because He forgot. It is because He is working at a depth you cannot see the bottom of.

Then comes the promise, and it is not the promise I would have written.

He gives power to the faint, and to him who has no might he increases strength. Even youths shall faint and be weary, and young men shall fall exhausted; but they who wait for the Lord shall renew their strength. They shall mount up with wings like eagles; they shall run and not be weary; they shall walk and not faint.

Not the strong will win. The strong fall down. The young burn out. The promise is for the ones who have run all the way out of themselves and are still, somehow, waiting. The NIV says those who hope in the Lord — and it turns out hoping and waiting are the same verb, the same act, the same stubborn refusal to stop looking up.

Here is the whole thing, as plainly as I can say it. I don’t think most Christians doubt that God is mighty. We’ll sing that all day long. He hangs the stars and calls them by name — fine, we believe it. What we doubt, at two in the morning, is whether that God will bother to help us. This situation. This prayer. The one we’ve held up so long our arms have gone numb.

That is the exact doubt God reaches for in verse 27. And His answer is not you were wrong to hurt. His answer is: I am not hidden. I am not disregarding you. Wait.

So tonight, wait.

But hear the tense of the promise, because everything turns on it.

They who wait for the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings like eagles; they shall run and not be weary; they shall walk and not faint.

Shall. Will. Later. The soaring is in the future, and the future can be years away — years of kneeling, years of the same worn prayer. The renewed strength is a promise still out ahead of you.

And yet look back at where the chapter opened, because that is the present tense. Comfort, comfort my people. Speak tenderly to Jerusalem. Tell her that her hard service is completed, that her sin is paid for. Not will be. Is. Already. The exiles were still sitting in Babylon when God announced that their warfare was over. You may still be on your knees when He says the hard part of your waiting is finished. The soaring is coming. The comfort has already started.

That is how grace works while you wait. He gives power to the faint, and strength to the one who has none left — not by lifting the weakness off you, but by quietly rebuilding you underneath it, for a day you cannot yet see.

And that day comes. There is no image in all of Scripture more liberating for someone who has knelt so long their knees have gone numb than this one. Not crawling. Not limping. Not merely surviving. An eagle — thousands of feet up, wings open, riding the very wind that used to knock you flat. The God who never grows weary does not just get you back on your feet. He gives you the sky.

So keep waiting. The kneeling is not the last scene. Out ahead of you, above Babylon and the grasshoppers and the numbered stars, something with wide wings is riding the high wind — weightless, unhurried, unafraid. Not long ago it was face-down on the floor, praying a prayer that seemed to land nowhere. That is you, later. Wait for it.

She Grabbed Two Flags

On Natasha, public love, and what God has been waving at us all along.

Screenshot

Al Ngu

The truck was already moving.

Borechka stood in the back with the other soldiers, headed toward the front lines, carrying whatever a young man carries when he knows the next weeks could be his last. The night before had ended badly. Natasha had come to him in the dark, afraid and wanting closeness, and he had pulled away. Not because he didn’t love her — she knew he did. He just couldn’t say it. Couldn’t cross whatever line lived inside him between feeling and declaring.

So she had gone back to her room. She told him she wouldn’t see him off.

She lied.

Because when the convoy rolled past the edge of the field, there she was. Standing alone. Holding two flags. Waving them in wide arcs with everything she had, spelling out in the open air what he had refused to say in the dark of a quiet room:

I love you, Borechka.

Three trucks full of soldiers saw it. They started hollering — hey, someone’s got a girl — and Borechka looked, and for a moment I think the whole world stopped. Then something broke open in him. He grabbed two flags of his own and started waving back. Not whispering. Not hinting. Waving. In front of everyone.

Natasha. I love you too.

She saw it. Her tears came down. She waved: I will wait for you.

He waved back: I promise I will return.

I was somewhere around episode twenty when this happened. I had followed these two people through all their hesitations, all their silences, all the cultural weight Borechka carried that kept him from doing the simple human thing of saying I love you to someone who needed to hear it. And then this. In a field. With flags. In front of an audience he never asked for.

I wept. I’m not ashamed to say it. I wept because it was beautiful, and because it was true, and because something in me recognized what I was watching.

The Man Who Couldn’t Say It

The Chinese man struggling to say what he felt — I understand that. Culture buries things. Propriety builds walls. Coming from a Chinese background myself, I recognize it. There is a silence that is taught, absorbed into the bones before you are old enough to question it. Expression of the heart, especially love, especially to a woman, especially in public — it stays locked inside. Not because the feeling isn’t there. Because the door has been sealed by something heavier than individual will.

So why would a woman fall for a man like that? A man who never once said I love you, who showed signs of affection — you could gather enough from his eyes, his presence, the way he stayed — but who would not cross the line into declaration?

I genuinely don’t know. I think love sometimes moves on a frequency that bypasses the rational mind entirely. Natasha saw something in Borechka that the silence couldn’t hide. She believed in what she felt more than she was discouraged by what he wouldn’t say. And then she went to a field with two flags and said it first.

That is what I want to stay with for a moment. Not his silence. Her courage.

She didn’t wait for him to become brave. She became brave herself and made space for him to follow. She took the risk of humiliation — of waving her heart across a field at a man who had already refused to meet her in the dark — and somehow that risk unlocked him. He grabbed two flags and stood up in front of every soldier in that convoy and he said it.

Love does that. It doesn’t just feel. It acts. And when it acts publicly, when it plants a flag in open ground and says this is what I believe, it invites others into their own courage.

I keep thinking about that field. I keep thinking about what it cost her to stand there.

What Gen Z Is Actually Crying Out For

There is something I keep noticing in Union Square on the mornings I stand there with my Bible.

The young people pass — Gen Z, mostly, twenties, some younger — and if you watch their faces long enough you stop seeing the phones and the headphones and the carefully constructed indifference. What you see underneath is something older and more urgent than any generational label.

They are looking for someone to love them.

Not romantically, necessarily. Or not only. But deeply. Unconditionally. Without the fine print. They want to belong somewhere that won’t eventually let them go. They want to be known and not discarded. This is true of Millennials too. It is true, at the core, of every generation that has ever lived — the longing for love and identity and belonging runs through all of us. But something about this moment feels more exposed, more raw. The cultural scaffolding that used to hold these longings at a manageable distance has come down. What’s left is the need itself, blinking in the open, enormous and unanswered.

This horizontal longing — what the Greeks called phileo, the love between persons — is real and it matters. Community, friendship, being seen: these things are not trivial. God wired us for them.

But I want to go deeper than the horizontal. Because at the very core of human longing — beneath the desire for belonging, beneath the hunger for intimacy, beneath even the need to love and be loved by another person — there is something that human love, however beautiful, cannot finally satisfy.

There is a shape of longing in us that is the exact shape of God.

The Love That Goes Public

Here is the thing about Christianity that I find myself returning to again and again:

The gospel is not a private transaction.

God did not slip a note under the door. He did not whisper something in the dark and then pull back in the morning. He went public. He went so public that two thousand years later we are still talking about it, still writing about it, still trying to comprehend the scale of the declaration.

For God so loved the world.

The cross is a flag in a field. It is the most exposed, most humiliating, most costly public declaration in all of human history. It is God standing in front of every soldier in every convoy that has ever passed, with both arms stretched wide — not waving flags, but nailed there, which is more extreme than flags, which is the most extreme gesture of love this universe has ever witnessed. Somebody preached once that the image of Christ on the cross, arms spread wide, bleeding, is the most potent visual declaration that has ever existed. Arms open as if to say: this is how much. This far. This wide. This costly.

I love you.

Not to a category. Not to humanity in the abstract. To you. To the Gen Z kid scrolling at midnight who doesn’t know if anyone sees them. To the one who has been told they don’t belong. To the one who is performing belonging so well that no one knows they’re dying inside. To the Millennial grinding through exhaustion, not sure what they’re building toward or whether it matters. To every human heart that has ever wanted to be loved the way Natasha wanted to be loved — fully, publicly, without reservation.

That love was declared before any of us arrived. The cross was planted in the ground before you knew you needed it.

The Width and Height and Depth

Paul prays in Ephesians for something that sounds almost impossible — that we would be able to comprehend the width and length and height and depth of the love of Christ. He doesn’t pray that we would understand the doctrine. He prays for supernatural capacity, because what God feels toward us exceeds the natural bandwidth of a human heart. You need the Spirit of wisdom and revelation even to begin to register it. It is that large.

I read that prayer and I feel something in me ache. Because most days I live as though the love of God is a theological category rather than a living force. I know it the way I know the boiling point of water — accurately, usefully, and at a certain remove.

But Natasha didn’t just know Borechka loved her. She was captivated by it. So captivated that she grabbed two flags and ran to a field.

When I was young and falling in love with the woman who became my wife, I drove two hours each way to see her on weekends. Two hours there. Roses. Two hours back. I did not experience this as a burden. I barely noticed it. Love recalibrates the cost of everything. What looks like sacrifice from the outside looks like obvious necessity from the inside.

Of course I drove four hours. I love her.

That is what the cross looks like from inside the love of God. Not reluctant sacrifice. Not divine duty performed with gritted teeth. Of course I went. I love you.

Augustine said it: our heart is restless until it rests in you. He didn’t say our theology is restless. He said our heart. Because the longing that drives us toward God is not an intellectual problem to solve. It is a love story we are already in the middle of, whether we know it or not.

The Lover and the Beloved

There is a book in the Bible that has always made cautious readers nervous. Song of Solomon — this ancient love poem full of perfume and longing and bodies and desire — sits in the middle of the Hebrew scriptures like a burning coal. The beloved longs for her lover with a hunger that is almost unbearable to read. She wakes up in the night reaching for him. She searches the city for him. She is undone by his absence and restored by his presence.

Christian interpreters from Origen to Bernard of Clairvaux read that and said: this is us. This is the longing of every human soul for the one who made it, the one it was made for. The man as lover is God. The beloved, the woman, is the church. You see how far God has gone in the public expression of his affection. He didn’t just write a theology of love. He wrote a poem about longing.

The Bible says Christ is the bridegroom and the church is the bride. We are waiting for his return. The parable of the ten virgins is about exactly this — the bride community watching, waiting, keeping their lamps lit for the one who is coming back.

Natasha waited for Borechka in silence for years. Decades. Not knowing if he was dead or imprisoned or simply gone. I wrote in an earlier essay about the particular cruelty of that silence — how not knowing is in some ways harder than loss, because grief without a clear object has nowhere to land. She hung on not because she had evidence but because she believed in the love. The love she had seen with her own eyes, felt in her own chest, received in those waving flags in that open field.

She trusted the declaration.

I think about the Christians I know who are white-knuckling their faith through silence — through prayers that seem to hit the ceiling, through years of waiting for something to break. And I want to say: you are not crazy for hanging on. You are Natasha in the years of not knowing. And the man in the truck waved. He waved in the most unmistakable way possible. He promised he would return.

He will return.

But more than that: he loves you now. In the silence. In the waiting. In the years when you don’t feel it tangibly. His love is not a human love that fluctuates with mood and circumstance. It is higher than that, stranger than that, more reliable than anything you have felt from another person.

What Happens When Love Actually Lands

Here is what I have found to be true: when you actually encounter the love of Christ — not just hear about it but encounter it — you cannot sit still anymore.

Something breaks open. The same way something broke open in Borechka when he saw Natasha in that field waving her flags. All the cultural silence, the restraint, the careful management of exposure — it couldn’t hold against what he saw. He grabbed two flags and stood up in front of every soldier in that convoy and he said it.

That is what the love of Christ does when it actually lands on you. It makes you restless. Not restless in the anxious way, but restless in the Natasha way — restless with something you cannot keep to yourself. It makes you want to go out and tell people. Not as a duty performed without conviction, not as language detached from experience, but as someone who has been found by something real and cannot keep quiet about it.

Paul didn’t pray merely that the Ephesians would have good doctrine about love. He prayed that they would be filled — flooded — with the Spirit of wisdom and revelation, so that they could know. Know it the way Natasha knew it in that field. Know it the way I knew it driving four hours with roses. Know it in the body, in the chest, in the parts of you that are beyond argument.

That knowing transforms. We need not more cultural accommodation or religious performance or superficial familiarity with God. We need an explosion of his love hitting us — invading us — the width and height and depth of it breaking through the crust of our routine and landing somewhere real.

Because love like that overcomes every barrier. Cultural barriers. Spiritual barriers. The silence of years. The fear of public exposure. The weight of not knowing. It overcame all of it for Natasha. It overcame all of it on the cross.

Come and Stand in the Field

In Union Square Park, I stand in front of strangers and I talk about Jesus. I think sometimes about what that looks like from the outside — a man in a park with a Bible, which is maybe the least fashionable thing possible in lower Manhattan. And I feel something of what Natasha must have felt in that field. The exposure of it. The risk of looking ridiculous.

But she grabbed the flags anyway.

Because the alternative — staying in her room, preserving her dignity, letting the trucks roll past without a word — was unbearable. She loved him too much to play it safe.

I love him too much to play it safe.

And so I stand in the park. And I wave.

He loves you. I have seen the declaration. It is public and permanent and it has not been revoked. It was made on a cross with nailed hands and it has been echoing across two thousand years of human history, reaching into every generation’s longing, answering the cry underneath the cry. The Gen Z young person scrolling at midnight, looking for someone to finally see them — he sees them. The Millennial carrying exhaustion like a second skin, wondering if any of this means anything — it means everything. The person from any generation who has ever wanted to be loved the way Natasha wanted to be loved: fully, publicly, without reservation.

You are the beloved. He is the bridegroom. The declaration has already been made.

I’m starting a community in Union Square Park called Hearts Burn NYC. We gather in the open — Gen Z, Millennials, people who have walked away from faith and people who have never touched it, people who are lonely, people who are searching, people who don’t yet have language for what they’re looking for. We stand in the same kind of field where the flags would have been waving if this were that story.

I believe we are in that story.

I believe God is still in the field, arms wide, spelling out the same message he spelled out on the cross.

I love you. I will return. Wait for me.

Come and stand in the field with us.

More is coming. I’m not done waving.

— Al Ngu

Hearts Burn NYC | Union Square Park | heartsburnnyc.com

The Veil Over the Heart

What 2 Corinthians 3 Actually Says About Freedom, Hardened Hearts, and the Crisis of Our Generation

Al Ngu

Part One of Three

I. A Sermon That Troubled Me

Once I sat under a sermon drawn from 2 Corinthians 3:17 — “Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom” — connected to Galatians 5:1: “For freedom Christ has set us free.” The preacher was earnest. The congregation was moved. And the message ranged across a familiar landscape of contemporary concerns: freedom from depression, from loneliness, from anxiety, from the gravitational pull of self-destructive habits. Real struggles. Real pain. And a real text.

But something did not sit right with me, and it took some time to name what it was. The sermon was not wrong to speak of freedom. The text does speak of freedom. But it had imported a meaning of freedom that the passage itself does not supply — and in doing so, it had bypassed the specific and more searching freedom that Paul actually has in mind. The freedom in 2 Corinthians 3:17 is not, in its first and controlling sense, freedom from depression or loneliness. It is freedom from something far more foundational, far more spiritually catastrophic, and far more precisely addressed by the new covenant: freedom from a hardened heart.

To miss this is not a minor exegetical slip. It changes the entire trajectory of what the gospel is being asked to do. A gospel that offers relief from circumstantial suffering without addressing the hardened heart that underlies it is a gospel that cannot sustain what it promises. It gives people something to feel without giving them something to become. And that, I will argue, is not the freedom the Spirit of God brings.

My burden in this article is pastoral and urgent. I am thinking specifically of people I know and love — young people and older ones alike — who once confessed Christ and now have walked away. Some have drifted quietly. Others have reconstructed a faith on their own terms, keeping a version of Jesus that never costs them anything. Others have deconstructed publicly and openly. I want to understand what is happening to them theologically. What does Scripture call this? Where does it come from? And is there any genuine hope for the heart that has gone to stone?

The answer begins in 2 Corinthians 3. And it is more searching, more specific, and more hopeful than most sermons on this text have led us to believe.

II. What the Passage Actually Says: The Veil and the Hardened Heart

Paul’s argument in 2 Corinthians 3 begins with Moses descending from Sinai with the glory of God radiating from his face — a glory so intense that Israel could not bear to look at him, and he was compelled to veil his face (Exodus 34:29–35). Paul’s interpretive move is audacious: he takes this familiar story and reinterprets the veil not merely as a physical covering over Moses’ face, but as a symbol of something that persists into his own present day.

“But their minds were hardened,” he writes in verse 14, “for to this day, when they read the old covenant, that same veil remains unlifted.” And then, more devastatingly: “Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil lies over their hearts” (verse 15). The veil, in Paul’s rereading, is not over Moses’ face. It is over the heart of the reader.

And what does this veil produce? He names it in verse 14: hardness. The Greek word is pōrō — to petrify, to turn to stone, to make callous. The law of Moses, read without Christ and without the Spirit of the new covenant, does not soften the heart toward God. It petrifies it. Not because the law is defective — Paul insists elsewhere that the law is holy and righteous and good (Romans 7:12). But because the law comes to a faculty that is broken. It commands what the unrenewed heart cannot do, and the result is not reformation but calcification. The heart that cannot obey grows harder in its inability. The veil thickens.

This is the specific bondage that verse 17 addresses. “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.” Freedom from what? Freedom from this. Freedom from the veil over the heart. Freedom from the petrified, stone-cold, unresponsive inner life that hears the Word of God and remains unmoved — not because it lacks information, but because the very faculty of reception has been shut down. This is the deepest slavery a human being can experience — not the slavery of circumstance, but the slavery of a will turned to stone. And it is from this slavery, specifically and precisely, that the Spirit of the new covenant sets us free.

The old covenant could diagnose this condition. It could not cure it. But the prophets had already heard God announce that he intended something more. Jeremiah heard it: “I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts” (Jeremiah 31:33). Ezekiel heard it in even more visceral terms: “I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. And I will put my Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes” (Ezekiel 36:26–27). The promise is not merely forensic. It is surgical. God reaches into the chest and replaces the stone with something that can beat, feel, and respond.

And in Luke 4:18, Jesus stands in the synagogue at Nazareth and announces that this promise has arrived in him: “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to proclaim liberty to the captives.” The liberty he proclaims is precisely this liberty — not first the liberation of the prisoner from his cell, but the liberation of the captive heart from its own petrification. This is what the new covenant brings. This is what the cross purchased. And this is why freedom in 2 Corinthians 3:17 is such a weighty and specific word.

III. What Hardness Looks Like in Our Generation

The hardening of the heart is not a first-century Jewish problem. It is a perennial human condition, and it takes recognizable forms in every generation. In ours, it presents most acutely in three overlapping patterns.

The first is simple drift. A person who once read Scripture regularly, prayed with some intentionality, and gathered with the body of Christ begins to withdraw — slowly, almost imperceptibly. Nothing dramatic has happened. The Bible is read less frequently. Prayer becomes occasional and then absent. Worship becomes something attended rather than something inhabited. The heart has simply been starved of the beholding that keeps it soft, and it has begun, by degrees, to harden. This is the quiet pastoral emergency that rarely makes headlines but accounts for the majority of spiritual casualties in any congregation.

The second is the backsliding pattern — a moral failure or a season of deliberate sin that, rather than driving a person to repentance, drives them to theological reconstruction. Because the heart cannot simultaneously pursue sin and submit to the God who forbids it, it begins to quietly renegotiate its theology. Passages that were once received as authoritative begin to feel culturally conditioned or misinterpreted. The Jesus who commands becomes the Jesus who affirms. The cross that demands death to self becomes a symbol of self-actualization. This is not intellectual honesty. It is the hardened heart generating the theology that the hardened heart requires.

The third is the deconstruction movement in its more ideologically driven form. Here the hardening presents as sophistication. The person does not abandon religion — they refine it. They read widely, cite scholars, express compassion for the marginalized, and position themselves as having grown beyond the naive faith of their upbringing. But the Scripture passages they select, the interpretations they favor, and the Jesus they construct have one consistent feature: they never demand anything the reconstructed heart is unwilling to give.

Paul had a name for all three patterns. He called it the veil remaining over the heart. The person may be reading the text — perhaps reading it seriously and at great length — but the veil is there. The glory of Christ in the Word does not penetrate. The text is processed but not received. The words are analyzed but not inhabited. And the result, in every case, is a heart that grows progressively harder toward the actual Christ of the actual Scripture.

This is one of the most urgent fronts of spiritual warfare in our age. Not because the attacks are new, but because the cultural conditions have made them uniquely pervasive and unusually difficult to name. When the hardening presents as enlightenment, when petrification wears the face of intellectual maturity, it is very hard to call it what it is. But we must.

IV. The Mechanism of Transformation: Beholding the Glory of Christ

How does the Spirit soften what has been hardened? This is the question the passage moves toward answering. And Paul answers it in the verse immediately following his declaration of freedom — 2 Corinthians 3:18:

“And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit.”

This verse contains the mechanism. Let us work through it carefully.

The key verb is katoptrizomenoi — beholding as in a mirror. It is a rare word, appearing nowhere else in the New Testament, derived from the Greek word for mirror. It carries a double sense: gazing into a reflective surface and, in that gazing, reflecting back what you see. The ESV renders it “beholding”; the NIV renders it “contemplating.” Both are right, and the tension between them is theologically productive: the believer gazes upon the glory of Christ, and in gazing, begins to mirror it. Beholding comes first. Reflecting follows as its necessary consequence.

The verb is in the present tense — indicating continuous, ongoing action. Transformation is not the result of a single powerful encounter, one mountaintop experience, one revival night. It is the cumulative fruit of sustained, habitual, returning attention to the glory of Christ. You become what you consistently behold.

The word translated “are being transformed” is metamorphoumetha — from the same root as our English word metamorphosis, and the same word used for Jesus’ Transfiguration on the mountain in Matthew 17:2. Paul is not describing a gradual self-improvement program. He is describing a structural remaking of the person, as radical as a caterpillar becoming a butterfly. And it is a passive verb. You are not transforming yourself. You are being transformed — by the Spirit, acting upon you, using the beholding as the instrument through which he does his work. The believer contributes the gaze. The Spirit produces the change.

The phrase “from glory to glory” — apo doxes eis doxan — signals progressive, cumulative, unceasing growth. A Semitic expression of intensification, comparable to Psalm 84:7’s “from strength to strength.” And crucially: unlike Moses’ glory, which faded because it was external and borrowed, the glory the Spirit produces in the new covenant believer increases. Its source is not a temporary encounter but the permanent indwelling of the Spirit of Christ himself.

What does beholding actually look like in practice? Paul himself answers this in the next chapter: the glory of God is seen “in the face of Jesus Christ” (2 Corinthians 4:6), mediated through the gospel — which is the Scripture. Jesus is the Word made flesh (John 1:14). When you gaze into the written Word, you are gazing into the incarnate Word. They are not two different objects. Scripture is the Spirit-given lens through which the risen Christ becomes visible to the unveiled heart.

And so the three great instruments of beholding are these. First, the daily meditation of the Holy Scripture — not the casual reading of a verse for emotional reassurance, but the sustained, submissive, returning immersion in the whole counsel of God. Psalm 1 describes the blessed man as one who meditates on the law day and night, and the Hebrew word for meditate is hagah — to mutter, to murmur, to turn a thing over repeatedly in the mind the way a cow works its cud. The text is not consumed and moved past. It is inhabited. And in that inhabiting, the glory of Christ embedded in every page begins to do its work upon the heart.

Second, prayer — which is not merely the recitation of requests but an increasingly intimate conversation with the living person of Christ. If Scripture is gazing at Christ, prayer is speaking to him. The beholding becomes a relationship. And in that sustained relational encounter, the Spirit works the same transforming alchemy: you become, gradually and sometimes imperceptibly, more like the one you spend the most time with.

Third, worship — private and communal. In worship, the beholding becomes embodied and affective. The heart does not merely observe the glory of Christ; it responds to it, is moved by it, is broken open by it. The “we all” of verse 18 is a plural. Transformation is not merely an individual project. The community of worshippers, gathered around Word and sacrament and prayer, creates conditions in which the Spirit can ignite in a congregation what may be only a flicker in an individual.

And here is the upgrade the new covenant brings over everything that came before: under the old covenant, these same practices — reading the law, prayer, worship — could be performed with a veil over the heart. The Israelites sang the Psalms and heard the Torah and offered the sacrifices, and still the hardness persisted. The glory was there, embedded in the text, but inaccessible — like sunlight behind a thick curtain. Under the new covenant, the Spirit has removed the curtain. The same Scripture now radiates with Christ. The same prayer now reaches the Father through the Son. The same worship is offered in Spirit and in truth. Same practices. Entirely different encounter.

V. Why So Many Are Still Not Free

If the veil has been removed permanently — if the Spirit now dwells within every believer, making the glory of Christ accessible through Scripture, prayer, and worship — why does the church still contain so many people whose hearts appear functionally hard? Why does deconstruction continue? Why does backsliding persist?

The answer is not that the new covenant has failed. The answer is that the removal of the veil is not the same as the sustained direction of the gaze. The door has been opened. But many believers are standing with their backs to it.

Regeneration gives the heart a new capacity to behold. But the flesh, the old nature, remains and wars against the Spirit (Galatians 5:17) — and it does not war alone. What we call distraction is rarely a neutral phenomenon. It is the surface symptom of something more sinister operating beneath it: the active, coordinated work of the enemy whose primary weapon, Paul tells us in 2 Corinthians 4:4, is deception. The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers — and his strategy against believers is the same, only subtler. He does not need to re-hang the veil that Christ has removed. He simply needs to turn the face away from what the veil’s removal makes possible.

This turning is never a single clean movement. It is a process — overlapping, cumulative, and mutually reinforcing. The demonic works through deception, planting doubts about the goodness of God, the reliability of Scripture, the coherence of faith. The flesh cooperates eagerly, finding in those doubts a permission structure for the desires it has never stopped wanting. The heart, shaped by both, begins to experience a creeping disillusionment — not a sudden collapse of faith but a slow cooling, a gradual withdrawal of trust, a progressive loss of appetite for the things of God. And the carnal mind, which Paul says in Romans 8:7 is hostile to God by nature, provides the rationalization that makes the whole drift feel like growth rather than departure.

These forces do not operate in sequence. They operate simultaneously, each one amplifying the others. The deception makes the flesh bolder. The flesh makes the heart more susceptible to deception. The disillusionment makes both feel reasonable. And woven through all of it is the noise of contemporary life — the curated digital worlds, the endless horizontal stimulation, the thousand small redirections of attention — which are not the cause of the hardening but the medium through which the other forces most effectively do their work. The enemy has never had a more efficient delivery system for spiritual numbness than the one we carry in our pockets.

The result is a heart that is not beholding Christ. And a heart that is not beholding Christ is a heart that is not being transformed. And a heart that is not being transformed is a heart that is becoming harder — not by dramatic apostasy, but by the quiet, daily compounding of a gaze that has been turned away.

This produces a downward spiral: no beholding produces no transformation, which weakens the desire to behold, which produces less transformation, which hardens the heart further. The Christian who once read Scripture with hunger finds the Bible growing dry. Prayer feels like speaking to the ceiling. Worship becomes performance. And at some point, the gap between what the professed faith demands and what the hardened heart can sustain becomes unbearable — and deconstruction presents itself as the intellectually honest exit.

There is also a genuine paradox at work that honest pastoral observation cannot avoid. The hardened heart does not want to read Scripture. But Scripture is what softens the hardened heart. The heart that avoids the Word grows harder. The harder it grows, the less it wants the Word. This is not merely a theoretical spiral. It is the bondage of the will that Paul describes in Romans 7 and that Augustine recognized in himself centuries later: the man who wants to do good cannot. The problem is not information deficit. It is a captivity of the wanting itself.

This paradox raises a question that this article cannot fully answer but refuses to leave hanging: if the hardened heart cannot soften itself, and if the beholding that softens it requires a willingness the hardened heart does not possess — who breaks the cycle? How does anyone get out? And what can those of us who love the deconstructed, the backslidden, and the drifting actually do?

That is the question the second part of this essay takes up. But before we get there, sit for a moment with the weight of what Paul has diagnosed. The veil is real. The hardness is real. The spiral is real. And the people caught in it are not primarily intellectual skeptics who need better arguments. They are people with hearts of stone who need the one thing no human being can give them — and that the new covenant promises God will.

* * *

This is Part One of a two-part essay. Part Two — “Preaching to Dry Bones” — takes up the theological and pastoral response: the doctrine of regeneration, and what those who love the hardened-hearted can actually do.

—

Al Ngu (MDiv) is a pastor and church planter in New York City, where he leads Hearts Burn NYC, a faith community gathering in Union Square Park. He writes at the intersection of biblical theology, pastoral concern, and the life of the Spirit for a generation in crisis.

The River Doesn’t Answer

by Al Ngu April 6, 2026

There is a scene I cannot get out of my mind.

A young Russian woman — I’ll call her Natasha — stands on the bank of the Amur River in the dead of a northern winter. The temperature is subfreezing. The river is vast. On the other side, China. She is waving. She has been waving across this river for weeks, and somehow it has become their language — the two of them on opposite banks, separated by the water and the politics and the soldiers, communicating in the only way they can: color, motion, presence. You wave, I wave back. I am here. You are there. The river is between us but we are not gone.

And then one day she comes to the bank and waves.

And the other side is silent.

He had been taken. Chinese soldiers had come for him — a young man in love with a Russian woman, waving across a militarized border during the Sino-Soviet split, which in the eyes of the state made him exactly one thing: a spy. He disappeared. No warning, no explanation, no goodbye. Just gone. And Natasha stood there on the Russian bank in the subfreezing cold, waving at nothing, tears pouring down her face, waiting.
She was pregnant with his child.

I watched this on a documentary. I don’t know with certainty whether every detail happened exactly this way — it may be dramatized, reconstructed, the way all memory and film and love stories are. But what I know is that it is true in the way that the most important things are true: it names something real about the human condition, about what love costs, about what silence does to a person who is waiting.

What followed was more than twenty years of silence.

Not five years. Not ten. Twenty years. Two decades in which Natasha did not know if he was alive or dead, imprisoned or freed, if he ever thought of her, if he had been broken into forgetting her. Two decades in which she raised a child who had never met his father. Two decades of going to a river bank, I imagine, and looking across at a country that had swallowed the person she loved and refused to give him back.

How does love survive that?

I’m asking seriously. I don’t have a clean answer. But I think that question is one of the most important questions a human being can sit with.

The border in question is the Amur River — called the Heilongjiang, the Black Dragon River, in Chinese. For over a thousand miles it runs as the contested frontier between China and the Soviet Union, and by the 1960s that frontier had become one of the most militarized stretches of land on earth. What had been a fraternal communist alliance had collapsed into mutual suspicion and ideological warfare. The Soviet Union massed sixteen divisions, over a thousand aircraft, and more than a hundred medium-range missiles along that border. China mobilized its own forces in response. Both governments were contemplating the unthinkable. Ordinary people who lived along that river found themselves suddenly stranded at the edge of a potential nuclear confrontation between two superpowers.

Into that, two young people fell in love.

They met somehow — the way people meet, in the ordinary porousness of border life before the clampdown fully came. Something kindled. They found ways to be near each other. And when the border hardened and the armies came and physical crossing became impossible, they improvised the only communion they could: they stood on their respective banks in the northern cold and they waved. Whole conversations conducted in color and gesture across a width of freezing water. Weeks of this. Something tender and absurd and completely serious, the way love always is when it refuses to accept the terms that the world is offering.

And then he was taken.

And the river went silent.

I need to say something about silence. Not the comfortable silence of a peaceful room, but the silence that answers you when you have called out to someone you love and they do not respond. That silence is its own kind of violence. It does something to a person. It raises questions that cannot be answered and therefore cannot be put down: Are you there? Did something happen? Did I do something? Do you still exist? The not-knowing is, in some ways, worse than the worst news, because at least the worst news is a fact you can grieve. Silence is a wound that stays open because nothing has come to close it.

Natasha waited through that silence for more than twenty years. I keep turning that number over. Twenty years is not an abstraction — it is a specific length of time that I can feel. Twenty years ago from today, I was in a completely different chapter of my life. Twenty years from now, if God grants it, I will be a different person in a different season. Twenty years is long enough for a child to be born and grow up. Long enough for certainty to erode, for memory to blur at the edges, for the world to insist — gently, persistently, reasonably — that it is time to move on. To stop standing at the river. To accept that some stories end badly and this is one of them.

She did not move on.

I don’t fully understand how. I suspect she didn’t fully understand how either. Love at that depth is not really a decision you make every morning — it is more like a fact about you that you keep discovering, even when you wish you could undiscover it. She loved him. The river did not answer. She loved him anyway.

Here is where I have to be honest about why this story hit me the way it did — and it is not because my situation resembles hers in any external sense. I have a wife I adore. God has been remarkably kind to me in marriage, and I do not take that for granted for a single day. The love story I am living is not a love story of anguish.

But there is another love in my life. A calling. A conviction that God has placed on me to build something in this city — a faith community for a generation that has largely written the Church off, that carries wounds from institutions that failed them, that hungers for meaning but flinches at the word “church.” I moved to New York. I planted a flag. I stood in Union Square with a folding table and a gospel and an open hand.

And ministry, I am learning, has its seasons of silence.

Not always dramatic silence. Not soldiers and borders and disappearances. But the quiet that settles when the response is small, when the crowd doesn’t come, when you have poured yourself into something and the river doesn’t wave back. The silence of faithfulness without visible fruit. The silence of calling without confirmation. The silence that makes a reasonable person ask: are you sure this is what you’re supposed to be doing? Shouldn’t something have happened by now?

I watched Natasha wave across the frozen river at nothing, and I felt the question form inside me in a different register — not about human love, but about divine love. About the love between a soul and God.

Can you love God through twenty years of silence?

This is, it turns out, not a new question. The Psalms are full of it. My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? That is not a statement of unbelief — it is a cry from someone who believed so hard they went looking for God and found an empty bank. The prophets knew it. Elijah, fresh off the fire of Mount Carmel, collapsed under a juniper tree and told God he was done. Job argued his case to a heaven that seemed to be ignoring him for chapters upon chapters. The saints across the centuries have named it — the dark night of the soul, the long season when prayer feels like waving at a river that doesn’t wave back.

What strikes me about every one of these figures is that they did not resolve the silence by pretending it wasn’t there. They named it. They raged against it. They sat in it. And somehow — not always with explanation, not always with a tidy resolution — they came out the other side still in love with the God who had seemed, for a season, to go quiet.

The resurrection of Jesus is the ultimate answer to this question, but it is an answer that arrives after three days of the most absolute silence imaginable. The disciples on Holy Saturday did not know a resurrection was coming. They knew a tomb. They knew silence. They knew that the one they had staked everything on was gone, and the river wasn’t waving back. The road to Emmaus is a story of two people walking away from Jerusalem in that silence — and the miracle is not just that Jesus appears, but that he walks with them in the direction they are already going, in their grief, in their confusion, in their having-already-given-up. The love came to them. The love did not wait for them to get their hope back before it showed up.

But I want to sit a moment longer in the silence before I get to the resurrection, because I think we move too quickly past the Saturday. The question Natasha poses from the bank of the Amur River is the Saturday question: can love hold on when it has no evidence to hold on to? Not when the miracle comes. Not when the answer arrives. Not when he finally reappears after twenty years and she finds out he was alive and he was faithful and the love was real. But in the middle years, the frozen years, the years of waving at nothing — can love endure that?

I believe the answer is yes. But I want to be honest that it is not a comfortable yes. It is a costly one.

What I am trying to build in this city is small right now. The first gathering was modest. The obstacles are real. There are moments when I stand at the metaphorical bank and wave and wonder if anything is there.

And I think what I am learning — what Natasha’s story is teaching me, what the Psalms are teaching me, what the whole long tradition of faithful waiting is teaching me — is that love is not validated by its results. It is validated by its staying power. The measure of love is not what it produces in the seasons of abundance but what it does with the silence. Does it keep showing up? Does it keep waving? Does it believe, against all visible evidence, that the other side of the river is not empty — that there is a presence there that has not forgotten, has not abandoned, is still oriented toward you even in the years when you cannot see a sign of it?

Natasha stood on that bank and waved for twenty years because she believed — maybe consciously, maybe just in her bones — that the man on the other side was real, and that he had loved her, and that love of that quality does not simply dissolve because the state makes it inconvenient. She staked her life on the reality of what she had known before the silence came.

That is what faith looks like. Not the triumphant faith of answered prayers and visible miracles — though those are real and I have known them. But the quiet, exhausting, unreasonable faith of someone who keeps showing up at the river because they cannot bring themselves to believe that the love they once knew is gone.
The river didn’t answer Natasha for twenty years. But she was right to keep waving. He was there.

I believe God is there too. I believe the silence is not absence. But I want to go further than that — because the story of Natasha and the young man across the river, as devastating and beautiful as it is, is not the deepest love story there is. It is a shadow of one. And I think we need to feel the full weight of the shadow before we can begin to grasp the glory of what casts it.
Think about what made their love extraordinary. He loved her across an impossible divide. She loved him through twenty years of silence. Neither of them quit, even when every force in the world said to quit. We watch that and we are undone, because we recognize instinctively that this is what love is supposed to look like — stubborn, costly, unreasonable, surviving everything the world throws at it.

Now consider Jesus on the cross.

Natasha loved a man who loved her back. Christ loved people who were killing him. Natasha waved across a frozen river at someone who was desperate to wave back. Jesus stretched out his arms on a cross toward people who put him there, who mocked him while he bled, who had abandoned him when it cost something to stay. Natasha endured twenty years of silence not knowing if she was still loved. Jesus cried out “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” — absorbing into himself the full, crushing silence of divine abandonment, so that the people who deserved that silence would never have to hear it.

And then, from the cross, while the nails were still in his hands, while the crowd was still jeering, while the blood was still running — he opened his mouth and said: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”

I have read that line hundreds of times. I have preached near it. But watching Natasha wave at an empty riverbank, tears streaming down her face in the subfreezing cold, something in that line finally broke open for me in a new way. Because this is not the love of someone waving across a river at the person they adore. This is the love of someone being murdered by the people he is forgiving in real time. This is love with no reasonable basis whatsoever — love that is not a response to being loved, but love that initiates, that absorbs hostility, that refuses to become what it is being treated as. This is love that does not wait for the silence to end before it speaks. It speaks into the worst silence, from the worst place, at the worst moment, and what it says is: I forgive you. I am still for you. You do not know what you are doing, but I do, and I am choosing this.

No human love has ever done that. Not Natasha’s. Not anyone’s. The love between that Russian woman and that young Chinese man across the Black Dragon River is one of the most moving things I have ever encountered on a screen. But it is, in the end, two finite people loving each other across a frozen river. What happened on Calvary is the infinite loving the finite across the ultimate divide — not despite hostility, but through it, for it, willingly, eyes open, arms wide.

That is the love I want to know. Not just know about — know, the way you know a person, the way Natasha knew the man she waved to, the way she knew his presence well enough to feel the agony of his absence across twenty years of silence. I want to know the love of Christ with that kind of depth and that kind of personal, irreducible certainty. And I want that knowing to be so real in me, so alive in my bones, that when I stand in this city and open my mouth, something transcendent comes out — not my eloquence, not my theology, not my best argument, but the overflow of a love I have actually experienced.
That is what I want to proclaim to the people of New York. Not a doctrine. Not a program. Not an institution. The love that said Father, forgive them while bleeding. The love that is more stubborn than twenty years of silence, more willing than any human devotion, more costly than anything Natasha ever paid — and offered freely, without condition, to people who were not waving back.

If that love is real — and I believe with everything I have that it is — then there is no one in this city too wounded, too cynical, too far gone, too long silent to receive it. I want to know it so deeply that when I speak of it, something in the listener recognizes it as true before I have finished the sentence. Because somewhere inside every human being, I think, is a Natasha standing at a frozen river, waving into silence, hoping against hope that love is still on the other side.

It is. And it is greater than she imagined.

That is worth proclaiming. Even in the cold. Even when the other bank looks empty. Even when it has been a very long time.

Al Ngu is the founding pastor of Hearts Burn NYC, a faith community in New York City.